Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 30;12(1):e12079.
doi: 10.1002/dad2.12079. eCollection 2020.

Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments

Naomi S de Ruijter  1 , Anne M G Schoonbrood  1 , Björn van Twillert  2 , Erik I Hoff  1
Affiliations

Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments

Naomi S de Ruijter et al. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). .

Abstract

Introduction: Anosognosia is a common but underrated symptom in dementia and has significant impact on both patients and caregivers. A proper evaluation of anosognosia is therefore desirable. There are three common methods to determine anosognosia: (1) clinical rating, (2) patient-caregiver discrepancies, and (3) prediction of performance discrepancies. Each of them includes different instruments. This review gives an overview of the current instruments used for the assessment of anosognosia in patients with dementia and aims to determine the most suitable instrument for routine use in clinical practice.

Methods: A search of the literature in PubMed was performed. Furthermore, electronic databases (PsycINFo, ClinicalKey, and Cochrane Library) and reference lists were searched for additional articles.

Results: Forty-six articles were included in this study, comprising 10 clinical rating instruments, 25 patient-caregiver discrepancy instruments, and 14 prediction-performance discrepancy instruments. For every publication, the aims of the study, the included population, the assessment instrument used, the assessed domains, and the psychometric properties of the assessment instruments are described.

Conclusions: Currently, there is no consensus on the most suitable method to determine anosognosia in dementia. We recommend the Clinical Insight Rating scale and the Abridged Anosognosia Questionnaire-Dementia as the most appropriate for routine use in clinical practice.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; anosognosia; assessment of anosognosia; dementia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Langer KG, Levine DN, Babinski J. (1914). Contribution to the study of the mental disorders in hemiplegia of organic cerebral origin (anosognosia). Translated by KG Langer & DN Levine: translated from the original contribution à l'étude des troubles mentaux dans l'hémiplégie organique cérébrale (anosognosie). Cortex. 2014. 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.04.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acharya AB, Sanchez‐Manso JC, Anosognosia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan. 2020 Jun 24. Accessed October 15, 2019.
    1. Lacerda IB, Sousa MFB, Santos RL, Nogueira MM, Dourado MC. Concepts and objects of awareness in Alzheimer's disease: an updated systematic review. J Bras Psiquiatr. 2016;65(1):99‐109.
    1. Marková IS, Clare L, Wang M, Romero B, Kenny G. Awareness in dementia: conceptual issues. Aging Ment Health. 2005;9(5):386‐393. - PubMed
    1. DeLozier SJ, Davalos D. A systematic review of metacognitive differences between Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016;31(5):381‐388. - PMC - PubMed