Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 7;22(10):e21367.
doi: 10.2196/21367.

Health Outcomes from Home Hospitalization: Multisource Predictive Modeling

Affiliations

Health Outcomes from Home Hospitalization: Multisource Predictive Modeling

Mireia Calvo et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Home hospitalization is widely accepted as a cost-effective alternative to conventional hospitalization for selected patients. A recent analysis of the home hospitalization and early discharge (HH/ED) program at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona over a 10-year period demonstrated high levels of acceptance by patients and professionals, as well as health value-based generation at the provider and health-system levels. However, health risk assessment was identified as an unmet need with the potential to enhance clinical decision making.

Objective: The objective of this study is to generate and assess predictive models of mortality and in-hospital admission at entry and at HH/ED discharge.

Methods: Predictive modeling of mortality and in-hospital admission was done in 2 different scenarios: at entry into the HH/ED program and at discharge, from January 2009 to December 2015. Multisource predictive variables, including standard clinical data, patients' functional features, and population health risk assessment, were considered.

Results: We studied 1925 HH/ED patients by applying a random forest classifier, as it showed the best performance. Average results of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC; sensitivity/specificity) for the prediction of mortality were 0.88 (0.81/0.76) and 0.89 (0.81/0.81) at entry and at home hospitalization discharge, respectively; the AUROC (sensitivity/specificity) values for in-hospital admission were 0.71 (0.67/0.64) and 0.70 (0.71/0.61) at entry and at home hospitalization discharge, respectively.

Conclusions: The results showed potential for feeding clinical decision support systems aimed at supporting health professionals for inclusion of candidates into the HH/ED program, and have the capacity to guide transitions toward community-based care at HH discharge.

Keywords: chronic care; clinical decision support; health risk; health risk assessment; home hospitalization; hospitalization; integrated care; modeling; mortality; prediction; predictive modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predictive analytics workflow, composed of 3 main steps: (A) feature selection, (B) data preprocessing, and (C) classification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the predictive modeling strategy taking, as an example, prediction of re-admission at home hospitalization discharge. Upper-left table: metrics used for model performance assessment; AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Center figure: representation of 1 decision tree using a random subset of features; on the nodes, threshold values for each variable determine the path from the root to the leaves (0.5 for Boolean variables), moving toward the left when the decision rule is meet; on a random forest model, final predictions are averaged over multiple decision trees. Upper-right table: 3 categories of data that are included in the models. *GMA category 404; 40: patient with active neoplasms; 4: high complexity conditions (percentile between 0.85 and 0.95).

References

    1. Leff B, Burton L, Mader SL, Naughton B, Burl J, Inouye SK, Greenough WB, Guido S, Langston C, Frick K, Steinwachs D, Burton JR. Hospital at Home: Feasibility and Outcomes of a Program To Provide Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Older Patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Dec 06;143(11):798. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-11-200512060-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caplan GA, Sulaiman NS, Mangin DA, Aimonino Ricauda N, Wilson AD, Barclay L. A meta‐analysis of “hospital in the home”. Medical Journal of Australia. 2012 Nov 05;197(9):512–519. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10480. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cryer L, Shannon SB, Van Amsterdam M, Leff B. Costs for 'hospital at home' patients were 19 percent lower, with equal or better outcomes compared to similar inpatients. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2012 Jun;31(6):1237–43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1132. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacobs JM, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, Stessman J. Home Hospitalization: 15 Years of Experience. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006 Mar 21;144(6):456. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacobs JM, Cohen A, Rozengarten O, Meiller L, Azoulay D, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, Stessman J. Closure of a home hospital program: Impact on hospitalization rates. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2007 Sep;45(2):179–189. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2006.10.009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types