Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;9(2):695-707.
doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00199-9. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

The Impact of OnabotulinumtoxinA vs. Placebo on Efficacy Outcomes in Headache Day Responder and Nonresponder Patients with Chronic Migraine

Affiliations

The Impact of OnabotulinumtoxinA vs. Placebo on Efficacy Outcomes in Headache Day Responder and Nonresponder Patients with Chronic Migraine

Stephen D Silberstein et al. Pain Ther. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: The phase 3 PREEMPT trials demonstrated efficacy and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA for headache prevention in adults with chronic migraine. OnabotulinumtoxinA significantly reduced headache frequency from baseline vs. placebo at 24 weeks; however, this measure may not fully capture the benefits of treatment. We evaluated the impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on patient-reported outcomes according to headache responder status.

Methods: A post hoc analysis pooled 24-week data from the placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind treatment phases of the PREEMPT trials. Patients were stratified by randomized treatment (onabotulinumtoxinA vs. placebo) and headache day responder status (responder vs. nonresponder). Headache day responders had a ≥ 50% headache day reduction from baseline measured at weeks 21-24. Outcomes evaluated were patient-reported reductions in moderate-to-severe headache days, Headache Impact Test, and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Missing values were estimated using a modified last-observation-carried-forward approach.

Results: In the pooled analysis population (N = 1384; onabotulinumtoxinA, n = 688; placebo, n = 696), headache day responder rates were 308/688 (45%) for onabotulinumtoxinA- and 238/696 (34%) for placebo-treated patients. At 24 weeks compared with baseline, onabotulinumtoxinA nonresponders showed significantly (all P < 0.01) greater mean (standard error) reductions vs. placebo nonresponders in moderate-to-severe headache days (- 3.5 [0.2] vs. - 2.4 [0.2]) and Headache Impact Test scores (- 2.3 [0.3] vs. - 0.8 [0.2]), and greater mean improvements in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire domains (Restrictive, 8.8 [1.0] vs. 2.9 [0.8]; Preventive, 6.0 [1.0] vs. 1.8 [0.8]; Emotional, 8.5 [1.3] vs. 2.8 [1.1]). Moderate-to-severe headache day and headache impact differences between nonresponder groups were evident at week 4 and sustained through week 24.

Conclusions: Relative to placebo nonresponders, onabotulinumtoxinA nonresponders experienced significant reductions in moderate-to-severe headache days and disability and improvement in quality of life, implying that the full benefits of onabotulinumtoxinA are not captured by headache day reduction.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT00156910 (PREEMPT 1) and NCT00168428 (PREEMPT 2).

Keywords: Botulinum toxin type A; Chronic migraine; Headache; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean (SE) change from baseline in moderate-to-severe headache days. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; P values for between-treatment comparisons (e.g., placebo responder vs. onabotulinumtoxinA-treated responder). P < 0.001 for all within-treatment comparisons (responder vs. nonresponder). SE standard error
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean (SE) change from baseline in total HIT-6 scores. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; P values for between-treatment comparisons (e.g., placebo responder vs. onabotulinumtoxinA-treated responder). P < 0.001 for all within-treatment comparisons (responder vs. nonresponder). HIT-6 6-item Headache Impact Test, SE standard error
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean (SE) change from baseline in MSQv2.1 domain scores: a Role Function-Restrictive, b Role Function-Preventive, and c Emotional Function. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; P values for between-treatment comparisons (e.g., placebo responder vs. onabotulinumtoxinA-treated responder). MSQv2.1 Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1, SE standard error

References

    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1–211. - PubMed
    1. Natoli JL, Manack A, Dean B, et al. Global prevalence of chronic migraine: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:599–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01941.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lipton RB, Manack Adams A, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML. A Comparison of the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study and American migraine prevalence and prevention (AMPP) Study: demographics and headache-related disability. Headache. 2016;56:1280–1289. doi: 10.1111/head.12878. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: results from the international burden of migraine study (IBMS) Cephalalgia. 2011;31:301–315. doi: 10.1177/0333102410381145. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buse DC, Manack A, Serrano D, Turkel C, Lipton RB. Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:428–432. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.192492. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources