Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;33(6):781-787.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000927.

Current state of noninvasive, continuous monitoring modalities in pediatric anesthesiology

Affiliations
Review

Current state of noninvasive, continuous monitoring modalities in pediatric anesthesiology

Jan J van Wijk et al. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The last decades, anesthesia has become safer, partly due to developments in monitoring. Advanced monitoring of children under anesthesia is challenging, due to lack of evidence, validity and size constraints. Most measured parameters are proxies for end organ function, in which an anesthesiologist is actually interested. Ideally, monitoring should be continuous, noninvasive and accurate. This present review summarizes the current literature on noninvasive monitoring in noncardiac pediatric anesthesia.

Recent findings: For cardiac output (CO) monitoring, bolus thermodilution is still considered the gold standard. New noninvasive techniques based on bioimpedance and pulse contour analysis are promising, but require more refining in accuracy of CO values in children. Near-infrared spectroscopy is most commonly used in cardiac surgery despite there being no consensus on safety margins. Its place in noncardiac anesthesia has yet to be determined. Transcutaneous measurements of blood gases are used mainly in the neonatal intensive care unit, and is finding its way to the pediatric operation theatre. Especially CO2 measurements are accurate and useful.

Summary: New techniques are available to assess a child's hemodynamic and respiratory status while under anesthesia. These new monitors can be used as complementary tools together with standard monitoring in children, to further improve perioperative safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Box 1
Box 1
no caption available

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lienhart A, Auroy Y, Pequignot F, et al. Survey of anesthesia-related mortality in France. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:1087–1097. - PubMed
    1. McCann ME, Schouten AN. Beyond survival; influences of blood pressure, cerebral perfusion and anesthesia on neurodevelopment. Paediatr Anaesth 2014; 24:68–73. - PubMed
    1. McCann ME, de Graaff JC, Dorris L, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age after general anaesthesia or awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 2019; 393:664–677. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Extensive multicenter study on the effects of general anesthesia in children.

    1. Friesen RH, Lichtor JL. Indirect measurement of blood pressure in neonates and infants utilizing an automatic noninvasive oscillometric monitor. Anesth Analg 1981; 60:742–745. - PubMed
    1. Hayes S, Miller R, Patel A, et al. Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia. Med Devices Evid Res 2019; 12:297–303. - PMC - PubMed
    2. The study shows that in children under anesthesia, the noninvasively with the oscillometry technique measured at the leg frequently deviated from invasive blood pressure measurements, which can be of clinical importance.