Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 7;21(1):834.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04768-3.

Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable trunk or limb pain: study protocol for a Chinese multicenter randomized withdrawal trial (CITRIP study)

Affiliations

Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable trunk or limb pain: study protocol for a Chinese multicenter randomized withdrawal trial (CITRIP study)

Yang Lu et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Although effective results of many studies support the use of spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain patients, no randomized controlled trial has been undertaken in China to date. CITRIP is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, withdrawal study designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of spinal cord stimulation plus remote programming management in patients with intractable trunk or limb pain.

Method: Participants will be recruited in approximately 10 centers across China. Eligible participants with intractable trunk or limb and an average visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 5 will undergo a spinal cord stimulation test. Participants with VAS score reduction ≥ 50% could move forward to receive implantation of an implanted pulse generator. In the withdrawal period at 3-month follow-up visit, participants randomized to the experimental group (EG) will undergo continuous stimulation while ceasing the stimulation in the control group (CG). The outcome assessment will occur at baseline and at 1, 3 (pre- and post-randomization), and 6 months. The primary outcome is the difference of maximal VAS score between EG and CG in the withdrawal period compared with baseline before the withdrawal period. Additional outcomes include VAS score change at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups; responder rate (VAS score improving by 50%); achievement rate of a desirable pain state (VAS score ≤ 4); awake times during sleep; Beck Depression Inventory for depression evaluation; short-form 36 for quality of life evaluation; drug usage; and satisfaction rating of the device. Adverse events will be collected. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle.

Discussion: The CITRIP study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a randomized withdrawal trial of spinal cord stimulation for patients with intractable trunk or limb pain.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03858790 . Registered on March 1, 2019, retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Chronic intractable pain; Efficacy; Randomized controlled trial; Safety; Spinal cord stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Primary investigator’s grants in this trial are supported by the sponsor. No additional reporting is allowed until the final report of the trial is completed, with the exception of consent by the sponsor. Information on the sponsor’s and investigator’s publishing policies will be described in their clinical trial contract.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the CITRIP study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standard Protocol Items (SPIRIT) for the CITRIP study

References

    1. Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain. 2012;13:715–724. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.03.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vannemreddy P, Slavin KV. Spinal cord stimulation: current applications for treatment of chronic pain. Anesth Essays Res. 2011;5:20–27. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.84174. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chakravarthy K, Richter H, Christo PJ, Williams K, Guan Y. Spinal cord stimulation for treating chronic pain: reviewing preclinical and clinical data on paresthesia-free high-frequency therapy. Neuromodulation. 2018;21:10–18. doi: 10.1111/ner.12721. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chakravarthy K, Kent AR, Raza A, Xing F, Kinfe TM. Burst spinal cord stimulation: review of preclinical studies and comments on clinical outcomes. Neuromodulation. 2018;21:431–439. doi: 10.1111/ner.12756. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor RS. Spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome and refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/failed back surgery syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2006;31:S13–S19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.12.010. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data