Factors associated with non-urgent visits to the emergency department in a tertiary care centre, western Saudi Arabia: cross-sectional study
- PMID: 33028545
- PMCID: PMC7539577
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035951
Factors associated with non-urgent visits to the emergency department in a tertiary care centre, western Saudi Arabia: cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objectives: To explore magnitude and factors associated with non-urgent visits to the emergency department (ED) in a tertiary care centre, western Saudi Arabia.
Design: A cross-sectional study.
Setting: ED of a tertiary care hospital in western Saudi Arabia.
Participants: 400 patients, both men and women.
Interventions: An interview-based questionnaire was administered to a consecutive sample of patients who visited the ED during morning shifts, where primary healthcare centres (PHCs) and outpatient clinics were available.
Primary outcome measure: ED visits classified as non-urgent versus urgent (excluding life-threatening conditions) based on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). Levels IV and V were classified as non-urgent.
Results: Majority of the cases were adult (97.3%) and half of them were women (54.8%). Non-urgent visits represented 78.5% among non-life-threatening cases. One-third of the patients (33.8%) had three visits or more to the ED during the past year. Main reasons for visiting the ED were perception that the condition was urgent (42.0%), easy access (25.5%) and limited resources and services at the PHCs (17.8%). Patients 40-50 years old were more likely to have non-urgent visits (OR=3.21, 95% CI 1.15 to 8.98). However, likelihood of non-urgent visits was significantly lower among patients with cancer (OR=0.37, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.72) and cardiovascular disease (OR=0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.83), and those who live near the hospital (OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.88).
Conclusions: The current study reported overuse of the ED. Enhancement of the primary care services, in concordance with community awareness, is an important component to reduce burden due to non-urgent use of the ED.
Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; organisation of health services; preventive medicine; primary care; public health.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Hogan TM, Spiegel T. Emergency medicine In: Geriatrics for specialists, 2016.
-
- Lee JY, Oh SH, Peck EH, et al. The validity of the Canadian triage and acuity scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011;19:68. 10.1186/1757-7241-19-68 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Şimşek P, Gürsoy A. Turkish health care providers’ views on inappropriate use of emergency department: who when and why? Int Emerg Nurs 2016. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous