Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;30(9):715-721.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011604. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

Use of telecritical care for family visitation to ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interview study and sentiment analysis

Farzan Sasangohar  1   2 , Atiya Dhala  3 , Feibi Zheng  3 , Nima Ahmadi  2 , Bita Kash  2   4 , Faisal Masud  5
Affiliations

Use of telecritical care for family visitation to ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interview study and sentiment analysis

Farzan Sasangohar et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: When the COVID-19 pandemic restricted visitation between intensive care unit patients and their families, the virtual intensive care unit (vICU) in our large tertiary hospital was adapted to facilitate virtual family visitation. The objective of this paper is to document findings from interviews conducted with family members on three categories: (1) feelings experienced during the visit, (2) barriers, challenges or concerns faced using this service, and (3) opportunities for improvements.

Methods: Family members were interviewed postvisit via phone. For category 1 (feelings), automated analysis in Python using the Valence Aware Dictionary for sentiment Reasoner package produced weighted valence (extent of positive, negative or neutral emotive connotations) of the interviewees' word choices. Outputs were compared with a manual coder's valence ratings to assess reliability. Two raters conducted inductive thematic analysis on the notes from these interviews to analyse categories 2 (barriers) and 3 (opportunities).

Results: Valence-based and manual sentiment analysis of 230 comments received on feelings showed over 86% positive sentiments (88.2% and 86.8%, respectively) with some neutral (7.3% and 6.8%) and negative (4.5% and 6.4%) sentiments. The qualitative analysis of data from 57 participants who commented on barriers showed four primary concerns: inability to communicate due to patient status (44% of respondents); technical difficulties (35%); lack of touch and physical presence (11%); and frequency and clarity of communications with the care team (11%). Suggested improvements from 59 participants included: on demand access (51%); improved communication with the care team (17%); improved scheduling processes (10%); and improved system feedback and technical capabilities (17%).

Conclusions: Use of vICU for remote family visitations evoked happiness, joy, gratitude and relief and a sense of closure for those who lost loved ones. Identified areas for concern and improvement should be addressed in future implementations of telecritical care for this purpose.

Keywords: critical care; human factors; qualitative research; quality improvement; visiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key components of Houston Methodist Hospital Virtual ICU. ICU, intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The number of interview participants compared with the number of COVID-19 positive patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of sentiment polarity between manual and automated classification (A) and intensity of shared sentiments using the automated analysis (B).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bell J. Telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation 2020;1:12610.
    1. Udeh C, Udeh B, Rahman N, et al. . Telemedicine/Virtual ICU: where are we and where are we going? Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2018;14:126–33. 10.14797/mdcj-14-2-126 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Subramanian S, Pamplin JC, Hravnak M, et al. . Tele-Critical care: an update from the Society of critical care medicine Tele-ICU Committee. Crit Care Med 2020;48:553–61. - PubMed
    1. Marra A, Ely EW, Pandharipande PP, et al. . The ABCDEF bundle in critical care. Crit Care Clin 2017;33:225–43. 10.1016/j.ccc.2016.12.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson JE, Meier DE, Oei EJ, et al. . Self-Reported symptom experience of critically ill cancer patients receiving intensive care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:277–82. 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00010 - DOI - PubMed