Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 19;18(3):169-175.
doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1762280.

Ureteric stenting vs not stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: A prospective randomised trial

Affiliations

Ureteric stenting vs not stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: A prospective randomised trial

Saddam Al Demour et al. Arab J Urol. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare three groups of patients who underwent uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) and to evaluate whether stenting could be eliminated after the procedure, as there is no consensus about whether a ureteric stent should be placed after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for stone retrieval.

Patients and methods: In this randomised clinical trial (NCT04145063) 105 patients underwent uncomplicated URSL for ureteric stones. They were prospectively randomised into three groups: Group 1 (34 patients) with a double pigtail ureteric stent, Group 2 (35 patients) with a double pigtail ureteric stent with extraction string, and Group 3 (36 patients) with no ureteric stent placed after the procedure. The outcomes measured were: postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score for flank pain and dysuria score, urgency, frequency, suprapubic pain, haematuria, analgesia requirement, operative time, re-hospitalisation, and return to normal physical activity.

Results: The mean (SD) operative time was significantly longer in groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3, at 22.2 (9.1), 20.2 (6) and 15.1 (7.1) min, respectively (P < 0.001). The results of the VAS for flank pain and dysuria scores, urgency, frequency, haematuria, and suprapubic pain showed a significant difference at all time-points of follow-up, being significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3 (all P < 0.001). Further analysis showed that measured outcomes, and analgesia need for groups 1 and 2 were similar, at all time-points except at week 1 and 1 month where Group 2 patients' had less symptoms (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Double pigtail ureteric stent placement appears to be unnecessary in procedures considered 'uncomplicated' by operating urologists during surgery. The advantages of the double pigtail ureteric stent with extraction string over the double pigtail ureteric stent only include earlier and easier removal with earlier relief of symptoms, and less analgesia requirements.

Abbreviations: KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; URSL: ureteroscopic lithotripsy; VAS: visual analogue scale.

Keywords: Ureteroscopy; lithotripsy; uncomplicated; ureteric stent; ureteric stone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The flow of participants through the study.

References

    1. Semins MJ, Matlaga BR.. Medical evaluation and management of urolithiasis. Ther Adv Urol. 2010;2:3–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160–165. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol. 2010;12:e86–96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prezioso D, Illiano E, Piccinocchi G, et al. Urolithiasis in Italy: an epidemiological study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86:99–102. - PubMed
    1. Seklehner S, Laudano MA, Jamzadeh A, et al. Trends and inequalities in the surgical management of ureteric calculi in the USA. BJU Int. 2014;113:476–483. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources