Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;65(1):7-14.
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13102. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

Are breast biopsy markers underused?

Rosanna Frost  1 , Philip Stephen Vlaskovsky  2 , Donna Blanche Taylor  3
Affiliations

Are breast biopsy markers underused?

Rosanna Frost et al. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate current use of breast biopsy markers (BBM) amongst Australian and New Zealand radiologists.

Methods: Radiologists attending a national breast conference were invited to complete an online survey addressing demographics, BBM use following ultrasound, stereotactic, tomosynthesis and MRI-guided biopsy, frequency of early BBM displacement, preoperative lesion localisation (PLL) and axillary BBM use.

Results: Overall response rate was 52% (60/115). The majority (n = 45) 75% practiced in Australia. 98% had BBMs available in their practice, 40% reported BBM costs weren't covered by insurance. 27% would use BBMs more often if they were, with some utilising smaller gauge devices for lesion sampling to minimise need for BBM use and patient out-of-pocket costs. Ultrasound-guided procedures were associated with lower rates of clinically significant BBM displacement (P = 0.001). Considering PLL, 44% were able to perform US-guided PLL in <25% of cases. Poor sonographic visibility was the commonest reason why this wasn't possible. In the axilla, BBMs were mainly used to mark positive nodes in pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients.

Conclusion: This survey is the first to provide data on BBM use amongst a sample of predominantly Australian and New Zealand radiologists, and provides compelling evidence of significantly lower incidence of BBM displacement with US-guided procedures. Our results suggest some radiologists may hesitate to use BBMs due to cost, and this can influence their choice of biopsy technique. Provision of a Medicare item Number for BBMs may lead to increased adoption of best practice guidelines for preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions.

Keywords: biopsy marker clip; breast; image-guided; localisation; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Thomassin-Naggara L, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Chopier J, Tardivon A, Trop I. Current opinion on clip placement after breast biopsy: a survey of practising radiologists in France and Quebec. Clin Radiol 2013; 68: 378-83.
    1. Thomassin-Naggara I, Lalonde L, David J, Darai E, Uzan S, Trop I. A plea for the biopsy marker: how, why and why not clipping after breast biopsy? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 132: 881-93.
    1. Shin K, Caudle AS, Kuerer HM et al. Radiological mapping for targeted axillary dissection: needle biopsy to excision. Am J Radiol 2016; 207: 1372-9.
    1. NHS Breast Screening Programme, Clinical guidance for breast cancer screening assessment. NHSBSP publication number 49 Fourth edition November 2016.
    1. American College of Radiology. ACR Practice parameter for the performance of ultrasound - guided percutaneous breast interventional procedures, 2016.

LinkOut - more resources