Efficacy of a Second Brain Biopsy for Intracranial Lesions after Initial Negativity
- PMID: 33029973
- PMCID: PMC7542000
- DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2020.16.4.659
Efficacy of a Second Brain Biopsy for Intracranial Lesions after Initial Negativity
Abstract
Background and purpose: The rationale for performing a second brain biopsy after initial negativity is not well evaluated in the literature. This study was designed to 1) assess the efficacy of a second brain biopsy when the first biopsy was nondiagnostic, 2) identify possible factors associated with an increased diagnostic rate in the second biopsy, and 3) analyze additional morbidity induced by the second biopsy.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2019, during which 1,919 patients underwent a brain biopsy, including 30 who were biopsied twice (1.6%). The specific histological diagnosis rate, diagnosis-associated factors, and complication rate were assessed for the 30 twice-biopsied patients.
Results: The second biopsy allowed a specific histological diagnosis in 86.7% of the patients who had initially undergone a nondiagnostic brain biopsy [odds ratio (OR)=7.5, 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.0-18.7, p<0.001]. The multivariate analysis showed that only prebiopsy corticosteroid administration (OR=2.6, 95% CI=1.1-6.0, p=0.01) was an important factor in predicting a nondiagnostic biopsy. None of the patients developed a symptomatic complication after the first biopsy, while two (6.0%) patients experienced a transient complication after the second biopsy (p=0.49).
Conclusions: Performing a second brain biopsy in patients who have an initial nondiagnostic biopsy is effective in most cases. We advocate that a second biopsy be systematically considered in the diagnosis algorithm of these patients after it has been verified that molecular testing cannot help to obtain a diagnosis. Corticosteroid administration can lead to nondiagnostic biopsies and should be avoided when possible during the prebiopsy period.
Keywords: brain tumor; corticosteroids; diagnosis; neoplasms; neuropathology; neurosurgery.
Copyright © 2020 Korean Neurological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Hall WA. The safety and efficacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Cancer. 1998;82:1749–1755. - PubMed
-
- Livermore LJ, Ma R, Bojanic S, Pereira EA. Yield and complications of frame-based and frameless stereotactic brain biopsy--the value of intra-operative histological analysis. Br J Neurosurg. 2014;28:637–644. - PubMed
-
- Czyż M, Tabakow P, Weiser A, Lechowicz-Głogowska BE, Zub LW, Jarmundowicz W. The safety and effectiveness of low field intraoperative MRI guidance in frameless stereotactic biopsies of brain tumours-design and interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial. Neurosurg Rev. 2014;37:127–137. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mathon B, Clemenceau S, Hasboun D, Habert MO, Belaid H, Nguyen-Michel VH, et al. Safety profile of intracranial electrode implantation for video-EEG recordings in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. J Neurol. 2015;262:2699–2712. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
