Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 22;124(42):9371-9384.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c07863. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

Differences in the Nature of the Phosphoryl Transfer Transition State in Protein Phosphatase 1 and Alkaline Phosphatase: Insights from QM Cluster Models

Affiliations

Differences in the Nature of the Phosphoryl Transfer Transition State in Protein Phosphatase 1 and Alkaline Phosphatase: Insights from QM Cluster Models

Rui Lai et al. J Phys Chem B. .

Abstract

Quantum mechanical (QM) cluster models are used to probe effects on the catalytic properties of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) due to metal ions and active site residues. The calculations suggest that the phosphoryl transfer transition states in PP1 are synchronous in nature with a significant degree of P-Olg cleavage, while those in AP are tighter with a modest degree of P-Olg cleavage and a range of P-Onuc formation. Similar to observations made in our recent work, a significant degree of cross talk between the forming and breaking P-O bonds complicates the interpretation of the Brønsted relation, especially in regard to AP for which the computed βlgEQ,lg value does not correlate with the degree of P-Olg cleavage regardless of the metal ions in the active site. By comparison, the correlation between βlgEQ,lg and the P-Olg bond order is more applicable to PP1, which generally exhibits less variation in the transition state than AP. Results for computational models with swapped metal ions between PP1 and AP suggest that the metal ions modulate both the nature of the transition state and the degrees of sensitivity of the transition state to the leaving group. In the reactant state, the degree of the scissile bond polarization is also different in the two enzymes, although this difference appears to be largely determined by the active site residues rather than the metal ions. Therefore, both the identity of the metal ion and the positioning of polar or charged residues in the active site contribute to the distinct catalytic characteristics of these enzymes. Several discrepancies observed between the QM cluster results and the available experimental data highlight the need for further QM/MM method developments for the quantitative analysis of metalloenzymes that contain open-shell transition metal ions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
The Protein Phosphatase-1 (PP1) and Alkaline Phosphatase (AP) feature a similar bimetallic binding site for a broad class of phosphate substrates (see Scheme 1). Shown in the boxes are the QM cluster models for the active site used here to compare the reactivities of PP1 and AP.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
The optimized substrate P-Olg bond distances in PP1 and AP, as compared to water; also shown are results for QM cluster models of PP1 and AP with swapped metal ions. The P-Olg bond is polarized and thus longer in length in the enzyme active sites. For the optimization in water, the substrate is solvated with twenty explicit water molecules (see Fig. S3), with the bulk water descried with CPCM.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Comparison of the tightness, P-O distances and fractional bond orders for optimized transition states structures in PP1-Mn and AP-Zn QM cluster models.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Superposition of the transition state structures in PP1-Mn(purple)/Zn(green) and AP-Mn/Zn with pNPP (tan) and pMPP (cyan) as substrates: the metal ions plays a major role in modulating the sensitivity of the transition state structure to variation in the leaving group.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Metal ion effects on the transition state structures in PP1 and AP using metal-swapped QM cluster models.
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
Comparison of Onuc and Olg charges in the phosphoryl transfer transition states in PP1 and AP with different substrates and metal ion occupation.
Scheme 1:
Scheme 1:
Aryl Phosphate substrates for PP1 and AP studied in this work
Scheme 2:
Scheme 2:
Phosphate monoester hydrolysis through a concerted pathway: bond formation to the nucleophile and bond fission to the leaving group occur simultaneously but not necessarily synchronously.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jencks WP Catalysis in chemistry and enzymology; Dover publications: New York, 1987.
    1. Cleland WW; Hengge AC Enzymatic mechanisms of phosphate and sulfate transfer. Chem. Rev 2006, 106, 3252–3278. - PubMed
    1. Kraut DA; Carroll KS; Herschlag D Challenges in enzyme mechanism and energetics. Annu. Rev. Biochem 2003, 72, 517–571. - PubMed
    1. Zalatan JG; Herschlag D The far reaches of enzymology. Nat. Chem. Biol 2009, 5, 516–520. - PubMed
    1. Andreini C; Bertini I; Cavallaro G; Holliday GL; Thornton JM Metal ions in biological catalysis: from enzyme databases to general principles. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 2008, 13, 1205–1218. - PubMed

Publication types