Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0240371.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240371. eCollection 2020.

Sex and gender considerations in implementation interventions to promote shared decision making: A secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review

Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso  1   2   3 , Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun  1   2   3   4 , Amédé Gogovor  1   2   3   4 , France Légaré  1   2   3   4
Affiliations

Sex and gender considerations in implementation interventions to promote shared decision making: A secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review

Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Shared decision making (SDM) in healthcare is an approach in which health professionals support patients in making decisions based on best evidence and their values and preferences. Considering sex and gender in SDM research is necessary to produce precisely-targeted interventions, improve evidence quality and redress health inequities. A first step is correct use of terms. We therefore assessed sex and gender terminology in SDM intervention studies.

Materials and methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a Cochrane review of SDM interventions. We extracted study characteristics and their use of sex, gender or related terms (mention; number of categories). We assessed correct use of sex and gender terms using three criteria: "non-binary use", "use of appropriate categories" and "non-interchangeable use of sex and gender". We computed the proportion of studies that met all, any or no criteria, and explored associations between criteria met and study characteristics.

Results: Of 87 included studies, 58 (66.7%) mentioned sex and/or gender. The most mentioned related terms were "female" (60.9%) and "male" (59.8%). Of the 58 studies, authors used sex and gender as binary variables respectively in 36 (62%) and in 34 (58.6%) studies. No study met the criterion "non-binary use". Authors used appropriate categories to describe sex and gender respectively in 28 (48.3%) and in 8 (13.8%) studies. Of the 83 (95.4%) studies in which sex and/or gender, and/or related terms were mentioned, authors used sex and gender non-interchangeably in 16 (19.3%). No study met all three criteria. Criteria met did not vary according to study characteristics (p>.05).

Conclusions: In SDM implementation studies, sex and gender terms and concepts are in a state of confusion. Our results suggest the urgency of adopting a standardized use of sex and gender terms and concepts before these considerations can be properly integrated into implementation research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of the Cochrane systematic review [16].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Social science & medicine. 1997;44(5):681–92. - PubMed
    1. Towle A, Greenhalgh T, Gambrill J, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision makingCommentary: Competencies for informed shared decision makingCommentary: Proposals based on too many assumptions. Bmj. 1999;319(7212):766–71. 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.766 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health affairs. 2013;32(2):276–84. 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin S. Pulse:“Shared responsibility” becoming the new medical buzz phrase. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2002;167(3):295 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seminar SG. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. Bmj. 2011;342:d1745 10.1136/bmj.d1745 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types