Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 8;5(52):eabe0367.
doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abe0367.

Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patients

Affiliations

Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patients

Anita S Iyer et al. Sci Immunol. .

Abstract

We measured plasma and/or serum antibody responses to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 in 343 North American patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (of which 93% required hospitalization) up to 122 days after symptom onset and compared them to responses in 1548 individuals whose blood samples were obtained prior to the pandemic. After setting seropositivity thresholds for perfect specificity (100%), we estimated sensitivities of 95% for IgG, 90% for IgA, and 81% for IgM for detecting infected individuals between 15 and 28 days after symptom onset. While the median time to seroconversion was nearly 12 days across all three isotypes tested, IgA and IgM antibodies against RBD were short-lived with median times to seroreversion of 71 and 49 days after symptom onset. In contrast, anti-RBD IgG responses decayed slowly through 90 days with only 3 seropositive individuals seroreverting within this time period. IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 RBD were strongly correlated with anti-S neutralizing antibody titers, which demonstrated little to no decrease over 75 days since symptom onset. We observed no cross-reactivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-targeted antibodies with other widely circulating coronaviruses (HKU1, 229 E, OC43, NL63). These data suggest that RBD-targeted antibodies are excellent markers of previous and recent infection, that differential isotype measurements can help distinguish between recent and older infections, and that IgG responses persist over the first few months after infection and are highly correlated with neutralizing antibodies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Measurement of IgG, IgM, IgA against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain among pre-pandemic controls and PCR positive cases.
Each dot represents a unique measurement of an isotype (Row A: IgG, Row B: IgM, Row C: IgA) in pre-pandemic controls (left panels) and PCR positive cases (right panels). The blue line is a loess smooth nonparametric function. Black dashed lines indicate the maximum concentration (μg/mL) found among pre-pandemic controls (IgG: 0.57, IgM: 2.63, IgA: 2.02). Horizontal jitter was introduced into the pre-pandemic controls. The limit of detection (μg/mL) was 0.04 for IgG, 0.28 for IgM, and 0.30 for IgA.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Parametric and nonparametric model estimates of time to seroconversion and seroreversion for each isotype.
A) The isotype cut-offs chosen for seroconversion were the maximum concentration (μg/mL) found among pre-pandemic controls (IgG: 0.57, IgM: 2.63, IgA: 2.02). The solid line represents the estimated cumulative distribution function of the time to seroconversion or reversion with 100 bootstrapped fits shown as transparent lines. The parametric accelerated failure time models assume a log-normal time-to-event distribution. Nonparametric estimates shown in grey were calculated using the Turnbull method. Only 3 individuals seroreverted for IgG, so no model is included. B) The table indicates the estimated average number of days since onset of symptoms it takes for a percentage of cases to seroconvert or serorevert. Bootstrap 95% confidence intervals are shown in parentheses.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization antibody titers in symptomatic PCR positive cases and correlation with anti-RBD IgG responses.
A) Each point represents a measurement of 50% neutralizing titer (NT50). Lines connect measurements from the same individual and a loess smooth function is shown in blue. B) The overall repeated measures correlation coefficient (r) is shown. Lines represent simple linear models for each time period.

References

    1. Lipsitch M., Swerdlow D. L., Finelli L., Defining the Epidemiology of Covid-19 - Studies Needed. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1194–1196 (2020). 10.1056/NEJMp2002125 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 28th September,2020.
    1. Zohar T., Alter G., Dissecting antibody-mediated protection against SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 392–394 (2020). 10.1038/s41577-020-0359-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Döhla M., Boesecke C., Schulte B., Diegmann C., Sib E., Richter E., Eschbach-Bludau M., Aldabbagh S., Marx B., Eis-Hübinger A.-M., Schmithausen R. M., Streeck H., Rapid point-of-care testing for SARS-CoV-2 in a community screening setting shows low sensitivity. Public Health 182, 170–172 (2020). 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang A. T., Garcia-Carreras B., Hitchings M. D. T., Yang B., Katzelnick L. C., Rattigan S. M., Borgert B. A., Moreno C. A., Solomon B. D., Trimmer-Smith L., Etienne V., Rodriguez-Barraquer I., Lessler J., Salje H., Burke D. S., Wesolowski A., Cummings D. A. T., A systematic review of antibody mediated immunity to coronaviruses: Kinetics, correlates of protection, and association with severity. Nat. Commun. 11, 4704 (2020). 10.1038/s41467-020-18450-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms