Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 8;10(1):16794.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73871-x.

Efficacy and safety of newer P2Y12 inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of newer P2Y12 inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis

Yue Fei et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Whether newer P2Y12 inhibitors are more efficacious and safer than clopidogrel and whether there is a superior one remain uncertain. We compared the effect of P2Y12 inhibitors on clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Randomized controlled trials comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, or cangrelor, in combination with aspirin were searched. Sixteen trials with altogether 77,896 patients were included. Compared to clopidogrel, cardiovascular mortality was reduced with prasugrel (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.97) and ticagrelor (0.82, 0.73-0.93). Myocardial infarction (0.75, 0.63-0.89) and major adverse cardiovascular events (0.80, 0.69-0.94) were reduced by prasugrel. Stent thrombosis was reduced by prasugrel (0.49, 0.38-0.63), ticagrelor (0.72, 0.57-0.90), and cangrelor (0.59, 0.43-0.81). It was reduced more by prasugrel than ticagrelor (0.69, 0.51-0.93). There were more major bleeds with prasugrel (1.24, 1.05-1.48). Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding was increased with prasugrel compared to clopidogrel (1.36, 1.11-1.66) and ticagrelor (1.33, 1.06-1.67). TIMI minor bleeding was increased with prasugrel (1.44, 1.16-1.77) and cangrelor (1.47, 1.01-2.16) compared to clopidogrel while it was increased with prasugrel compared to ticagrelor (1.32, 1.01-1.72). Prasugrel is preferable to those ACS patients at low bleeding risk to reduce cardiovascular events whereas ticagrelor is a relatively safe antiplatelet drug of choice for most patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Network profile for the studies comparing different P2Y12 inhibitors involved in DAPT. Each line represents a pair of direct comparison between different P2Y12 inhibitors. The width of the lines is proportional to the number of trials comparing every pair of treatments, and the size of every circle is proportional to the number of randomly assigned participants (sample size).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots assessing the effects of different P2Y12 inhibitors relative to clopidogrel. (A) Cardiovascular mortality. (B) Myocardial infarction. (C) Stroke. (D) MACE. (E) Definite or probable stent thrombosis. (F) All-cause mortality. MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events. Square markers indicate odds ratios for cardiovascular outcomes comparing different P2Y12 inhibitors to clopidogrel. The horizontal lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Amsterdam EA, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014;64(24):e139–e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Gara PT, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362–425. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742c84. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yusuf S, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;345:494–502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010746. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL, O’Connor CM. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: Response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2908–2913. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072771.11429.83. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angiolillo DJ, et al. Variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel: Clinical implications, management, and future perspectives. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007;49(14):1505–1516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.11.044. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances