Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;22(1):1-10.
doi: 10.1007/s10561-020-09869-6. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

Effect of different human tissue processing techniques on SARS-CoV-2 inactivation-review

Affiliations
Review

Effect of different human tissue processing techniques on SARS-CoV-2 inactivation-review

André Oliveira Paggiaro et al. Cell Tissue Bank. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

The safety of the tissue transplant recipient is a top priority for tissue banks, and the emergence of the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has raised significant concerns about the risks of releasing tissue for clinical use. In the present study, we conducted a literature review about the potential infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in different biological tissues and the influence of various tissue processing and sterilization procedures on viral inactivation. The search revealed that SARS-CoV-2 binds to the human angiotensin-converting enzyme receptor to penetrate human cells. These receptors are present in skin cells, musculoskeletal tissue, amniotic membranes, cardiovascular tissue and ocular tissues, including the cornea. In general, we found that coronaviruses are stable at low temperatures, and inactivated upon exposure to extreme heat and pH. Notably, gamma irradiation, which has already been employed to inactivate SARS and MERS, could be useful for sterilizing skin, amnion and musculoskeletal tissues against SARS-CoV-2. We conclude that due to the limited information about the effects of physical and chemical tissue processing methods on viral neutralization, rigorous donor screening is still essential for tissue transplant recipient safety.

Keywords: Covid-19; Infections; Patient safety; Tissue transplantation; Virus inactivation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashford P. Traceability. Cell Tissue Bank. 2010;11:329–333. doi: 10.1007/s10561-010-9195-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chamorro C, Palencia E, Bodí MA, Garrido G. Valoración del potencial donante de órganos y tejidos en el seno de la pandemia por gripe A H1N1. Med Intens. 2010;34:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2009.11.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang L, Yan Y, Wang L. Coronavirus disease 2019: coronaviruses and blood safety. Transfus Med Rev. 2020;34(2):75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2020.02.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen J. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of 2019-nCoV—a quick overview and comparison with other emerging viruses. Microbes Infect. 2020;22:69–71. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cong Y, Kriegenburg F, De Haan CAM, Reggiori F. Coronavirus nucleocapsid proteins assemble constitutively in high molecular oligomers. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06062-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed