Effect of Fluorescence Visualization-Guided Surgery on Local Recurrence of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Importance: High local recurrence rates with aggressive disease remain the main concern in oral cancer survival. Use of a translational device using fluorescence visualization (FV) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada, has shown a marked reduction in the 3-year local recurrence rate of high-grade oral lesions in a single-center observational study.

Objective: To determine whether FV- guided surgery can improve local control rates in the treatment of in situ or T1 to T2 category oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Design, setting, and participants: A multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in a surgical setting. A total of 457 patients were enrolled between January 18, 2010, and April 30, 2015. Data analysis of the intention-to-treat population was performed from April 3, 2019, to March 20, 2020. Patients with histologically confirmed high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ or T1 to T2 category OSCC were randomized to receive traditional peroral surgery or FV-guided surgery.

Intervention: Fluorescence visualization during surgery.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was local recurrence of OSCC. Secondary outcomes were failure of the first-pass margin, defined as a histologically confirmed positive margin for severe dysplasia or greater histologic change of the main specimen (ie, not the margins taken from the resection bed), regional or distant metastasis, and death due to disease.

Results: Of the 457 patients enrolled in the study, 443 patients (264 [59.6%] men; mean [SD] age, 61.5 [13.3] years) completed the randomized treatment: 227 FV-guided and 216 non-FV guided surgery. The median follow-up was 52 (range, 0.29-90.8) months. In total, 45 patients (10.2%) experienced local recurrence. The 3-year local recurrence rate was 9.4% in the FV-guided group and 7.2% in the non-FV group (difference, 2.2%; 95% CI, -3.2% to 7.4%). Other similarities between the FV vs non-FV groups included failure of first-pass margin (68/227 [30.0%]) vs 65/216 [30.1%]), regional failure (39/227 [17.2%] vs 37/216 [17.1%]), disease-specific survival (23/227 [10.1%] vs 19/26 [8.8%]), and overall survival (41/227 [18.1%] vs 38/216 [17.6%]) were also similar between groups. No adverse events were judged to be related to the intervention.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, FV-guided surgery did not improve local control rates in the treatment of patients with in situ or T1 to T2 category oral cancer. Under a controlled environment, FV-guided surgery did not have an evident effect in reduction of local recurrence for localized OSCC. This result suggests that attention be directed to strategies other than improving definitions of nonapparent disease at clinical margins to identify the sources of local recurrence.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT01039298.

Figure 1.. CONSORT Flow Diagram

FV indicates fluorescence visualization.

Figure 2.. Cumulative Incidence Curves for Local Recurrence

The dashed lines represent competing risk of death for fluorescence visualization–guided and white light–guided treatment groups.

Figure 3.. Cumulative Incidence Curves for Secondary Outcomes

A, Regional; B, Distant failure or died of disease; C, All deaths. Dashed lines represent competing risk of death and death from other causes in the fluorescence visualization–guided and white light–guided treatment groups.