The diagnostic and prognostic value of near-normal perfusion or borderline ischemia on stress myocardial perfusion imaging
- PMID: 33034835
- DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02375-y
The diagnostic and prognostic value of near-normal perfusion or borderline ischemia on stress myocardial perfusion imaging
Abstract
Background: Data on the diagnostic and prognostic value of subtle abnormalities on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) are limited.
Methods and results: In a retrospective single-center cohort of patients who underwent regadenoson SPECT-MPI, near-normal MPI was defined as normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) and a summed stress score (SSS) of 1-3 vs SSS = 0 in normal MPI. Borderline ischemia was defined as normal LVEF, SSS = 1-3, and a summed difference score (SDS) of 1 vs SDS = 0 in the absence of ischemia. Coronary angiography data within 6 months from MPI were tabulated. Patients were followed for cardiac death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization (CR), and Late CR (LCR) [> 90 days post MPI]. Among 6,802 patients (mean age, 62 ± 13 years; 42% men), followed for a mean of 2.5 ± 2.1 years, 4,398 had normal MPI, 2,404 had near-normal MPI, and 972 had borderline ischemia. Among patients who underwent angiography within 6 months, obstructive (≥ 70% or left main ≥ 50%) CAD was observed at higher rates among subjects with near-normal MPI (33.5% vs 25.5%; P = .049) and those with borderline ischemia (40.5% vs 25.8%; P = .004). During follow-up, 158 (2.3%) CD/MI, 246 (3.6%) CR, and 150 (2.2%) LCR were observed. Near-normal MPI (SSS = 1-3), compared to normal MPI (SSS = 0), was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of the composite endpoint of CD/MI (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], .88-1.66; P = .243) or LCR (HR 1.28; CI .93-1.78; P = .130), but was associated with a significant increase in the risk of CR (HR 1.91; CI 1.49-2.46; P < .001). Borderline ischemia (SDS = 1), compared to no ischemia (SDS = 0), was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of CD/MI [HR 1.09; CI .70-1.69; P = .693], but was associated with a significant increase in the risk of CR (HR 5.62; CI 3.08-10.25; P < .001) and LCR (HR 2.98; CI 1.36-6.53; P = .006).
Conclusion: Near-normal MPI and borderline ischemia on SPECT-MPI provide no significant prognostic information in predicting hard cardiac events but are associated with higher rates of obstructive angiographic CAD and coronary revascularizations.
Keywords: Regadenoson; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; diagnosis; major adverse cardiac events; myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI); prognosis.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
Comment in
-
Drawing the line between a normal and mildly abnormal nuclear cardiology scan.J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):836-839. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02477-7. Epub 2021 Jan 18. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 33462783 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):810-821. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02382-z. Epub 2020 Oct 8. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 33034037
-
The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease.J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Feb;24(1):112-118. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0303-4. Epub 2015 Nov 18. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 26582040
-
Prognostic value of transient ischemic dilation with regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Oct;23(5):1147-1155. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0272-7. Epub 2015 Oct 21. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26490267
-
Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Apr;25(4):281-293. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01851-4. Epub 2023 Feb 24. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023. PMID: 36826689 Review.
-
The prognostic value of non-perfusion variables obtained during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):390-413. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0441-3. Epub 2016 Mar 3. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26940574 Review.
Cited by
-
The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):810-821. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02382-z. Epub 2020 Oct 8. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 33034037
-
Age-Specific Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Sep 13;10(9):395. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10090395. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023. PMID: 37754824 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction Reduction and Transient Ischemic Dilation in Patients With Normal Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.Cureus. 2022 Dec 26;14(12):e32950. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32950. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36712751 Free PMC article.
-
Epicardial fat volume, an independent risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events, had an incremental prognostic value to myocardial perfusion imaging in Chinese populations with suspected or known coronary artery disease with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 2;10:1261215. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1261215. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37849937 Free PMC article.
-
Drawing the line between a normal and mildly abnormal nuclear cardiology scan.J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):836-839. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02477-7. Epub 2021 Jan 18. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 33462783 No abstract available.
References
-
- Einstein AJ, Pascual TN, Mercuri M, Karthikeyan G, Vitola JV, Mahmarian JJ, et al. Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: Results from the 65 country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1689–96. - DOI
-
- Doukky R, Hayes K, Frogge N, Balakrishnan G, Dontaraju VS, Rangel MO, et al. Impact of appropriate use on the prognostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation. 2013;128:1634–43. - DOI
-
- Hage FG, Ghimire G, Lester D, McKay J, Bleich S, El-Hajj S, et al. The prognostic value of regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:1214–21. - DOI
-
- Kattoor AJ, Kolkailah AA, Iskander F, Iskander M, Diep L, Khan R, et al. The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: The largest cohort to date. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02135-y . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dorbala S, Ananthasubramaniam K, Armstrong IS, Chareonthaitawee P, DePuey EG, Einstein AJ, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging guidelines: Instrumentation, acquisition, processing, and interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25:1784–846. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous