The diagnostic and prognostic value of near-normal perfusion or borderline ischemia on stress myocardial perfusion imaging
- PMID: 33034835
- DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02375-y
The diagnostic and prognostic value of near-normal perfusion or borderline ischemia on stress myocardial perfusion imaging
Abstract
Background: Data on the diagnostic and prognostic value of subtle abnormalities on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) are limited.
Methods and results: In a retrospective single-center cohort of patients who underwent regadenoson SPECT-MPI, near-normal MPI was defined as normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) and a summed stress score (SSS) of 1-3 vs SSS = 0 in normal MPI. Borderline ischemia was defined as normal LVEF, SSS = 1-3, and a summed difference score (SDS) of 1 vs SDS = 0 in the absence of ischemia. Coronary angiography data within 6 months from MPI were tabulated. Patients were followed for cardiac death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization (CR), and Late CR (LCR) [> 90 days post MPI]. Among 6,802 patients (mean age, 62 ± 13 years; 42% men), followed for a mean of 2.5 ± 2.1 years, 4,398 had normal MPI, 2,404 had near-normal MPI, and 972 had borderline ischemia. Among patients who underwent angiography within 6 months, obstructive (≥ 70% or left main ≥ 50%) CAD was observed at higher rates among subjects with near-normal MPI (33.5% vs 25.5%; P = .049) and those with borderline ischemia (40.5% vs 25.8%; P = .004). During follow-up, 158 (2.3%) CD/MI, 246 (3.6%) CR, and 150 (2.2%) LCR were observed. Near-normal MPI (SSS = 1-3), compared to normal MPI (SSS = 0), was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of the composite endpoint of CD/MI (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], .88-1.66; P = .243) or LCR (HR 1.28; CI .93-1.78; P = .130), but was associated with a significant increase in the risk of CR (HR 1.91; CI 1.49-2.46; P < .001). Borderline ischemia (SDS = 1), compared to no ischemia (SDS = 0), was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of CD/MI [HR 1.09; CI .70-1.69; P = .693], but was associated with a significant increase in the risk of CR (HR 5.62; CI 3.08-10.25; P < .001) and LCR (HR 2.98; CI 1.36-6.53; P = .006).
Conclusion: Near-normal MPI and borderline ischemia on SPECT-MPI provide no significant prognostic information in predicting hard cardiac events but are associated with higher rates of obstructive angiographic CAD and coronary revascularizations.
Keywords: Regadenoson; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; diagnosis; major adverse cardiac events; myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI); prognosis.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
Comment in
-
Drawing the line between a normal and mildly abnormal nuclear cardiology scan.J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):836-839. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02477-7. Epub 2021 Jan 18. J Nucl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 33462783 No abstract available.
References
-
- Einstein AJ, Pascual TN, Mercuri M, Karthikeyan G, Vitola JV, Mahmarian JJ, et al. Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: Results from the 65 country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1689–96. - DOI
-
- Doukky R, Hayes K, Frogge N, Balakrishnan G, Dontaraju VS, Rangel MO, et al. Impact of appropriate use on the prognostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation. 2013;128:1634–43. - DOI
-
- Hage FG, Ghimire G, Lester D, McKay J, Bleich S, El-Hajj S, et al. The prognostic value of regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:1214–21. - DOI
-
- Kattoor AJ, Kolkailah AA, Iskander F, Iskander M, Diep L, Khan R, et al. The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: The largest cohort to date. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02135-y . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dorbala S, Ananthasubramaniam K, Armstrong IS, Chareonthaitawee P, DePuey EG, Einstein AJ, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging guidelines: Instrumentation, acquisition, processing, and interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25:1784–846. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
