Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 6;10(10):1820.
doi: 10.3390/ani10101820.

Zoonotic Viruses in Three Species of Voles from Poland

Affiliations

Zoonotic Viruses in Three Species of Voles from Poland

Maciej Grzybek et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Rodents are known to be reservoir hosts for a plethora of zoonotic viruses and therefore play a significant role in the dissemination of these pathogens. We trapped three vole species (Microtus arvalis, Alexandromys oeconomus and Microtus agrestis) in northeastern Poland, all of which are widely distributed species in Europe. Using immunofluorescence assays, we assessed serum samples for the presence of antibodies to hantaviruses, arenaviruses and cowpox viruses (CPXV). We detected antibodies against CPXV and Puumala hantavirus (PUUV), the overall seroprevalence of combined viral infections being 18.2% [10.5-29.3] and mostly attributed to CPXV. We detected only one PUUV/TULV cross-reaction in Microtus arvalis (1.3% [0.1-7.9]), but found similar levels of antibodies against CPXV in all three vole species. There were no significant differences in seroprevalence of CPXV among host species and age categories, nor between the sexes. These results contribute to our understanding of the distribution and abundance of CPXV in voles in Europe, and confirm that CPXV circulates also in Microtus and Alexandromys voles in northeastern Poland.

Keywords: Alexandromys; CPXV; LCMV; PUUV; Poland; TULV; arenavirus; hantavirus; microtus; seroprevalence; vole.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Seroprevalence of cowpox virus within: (A) three vole species; (B) host sex; (C) host age. Number of animals sampled: Microtus arvalis (n = 51); Alexandromys oeconomus (n = 16); Microtus agrestis (n = 10).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Luis A.D., Hayman D.T.S., O’Shea T.J., Cryan P.M., Gilbert A.T., Pulliam J.R.C., Mills J.N., Timonin M.E., Willis C.K.R., Cunningham A.A., et al. A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: Are bats special? Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013;280:20122753. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2753. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mills J. Ecologic Studies of Rodent Reservoirs: Their Relevance for Human Health. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1998;4:529–537. doi: 10.3201/eid0404.980403. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bordes F., Blasdell K., Morand S. Transmission ecology of rodent-borne diseases: New frontiers. Integr. Zool. 2015;10:424–435. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12149. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kallio E.R., Begon M., Henttonen H., Koskela E., Mappes T., Vaheri A., Vapalahti O. Cyclic hantavirus epidemics in humans—Predicted by rodent host dynamics. Epidemics. 2009;1:101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2009.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olsson G.E., Hjertqvist M., Lundkvist Å., Hörnfeldt B. Predicting High Risk for Human Hantavirus Infections, Sweden. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009;15:104–106. doi: 10.3201/eid1501.080502. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources