Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct-Dec;66(4):200-205.
doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_591_20.

The power of subjectivity in competency-based assessment

A Virk  1 , A Joshi  2 , R Mahajan  3 , T Singh  4
Affiliations

The power of subjectivity in competency-based assessment

A Virk et al. J Postgrad Med. 2020 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

With the introduction of competency-based undergraduate curriculum in India, a paradigm shift in the assessment methods and tools will be the need of the hour. Competencies are complex combinations of various attributes, many of which being not assessable by objective methods. Assessment of affective and communication domains has always been neglected for want of objective methods. Areas like professionalism, ethics, altruism, and communication-so vital for being an Indian Medical Graduate, can be assessed longitudinally applying subjective means only. Though subjectivity has often been questioned as being biased, it has been proven time and again that a subjective assessment in expert hands gives comparable results as that of any objective assessment. By insisting on objectivity, we may compromise the validity of the assessment and deprive the students of enriched subjective feedback and judgement also. This review highlights the importance of subjective assessment in competency-based assessment and ways and means of improving the rigor of subjective assessment, with particular emphasis on the development and use of rubrics.

Keywords: Competency-Based Medical Education; objectivity; reliability; rubrics; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identical characteristics of competency based and expert subjective assessment
Figure 2
Figure 2
Three main levels of a rubric grid
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. Merging views on assessment. Med Educ. 2004;38:1208–10. - PubMed
    1. Pereira DA, Flores M, Niklasson L. Assessment revisited: A review of research in assessment and evaluation in higher education. Assess Eval High Educ. 2015;41:1008–32.
    1. Lurie SJ, Mooney CJ, Lyness JM. Pitfalls in assessment of competency based educational objectives. Acad Med. 2011;86:412–4. - PubMed
    1. Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Favier RP, Rietbroek NJ, Theyse LFH, Brommer H, et al. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: When theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ. 2018;13:123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brightwell A, Grand J. Competency based training: Who benefits? Postgrad Med J. 2013;89:107–10. - PubMed