Deep learning-based image reconstruction for brain CT: improved image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V)
- PMID: 33037503
- DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02574-x
Deep learning-based image reconstruction for brain CT: improved image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V)
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the image quality of brain computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V).
Methods: Sixty-two patients underwent routine noncontrast brain CT scans and datasets were reconstructed with 30% ASIR-V and DLIR with three selectable reconstruction strength levels (low, medium, high). Objective parameters including CT attenuation, noise, noise reduction rate, artifact index of the posterior cranial fossa, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured at the levels of the centrum semiovale and basal ganglia. Subjective parameters including gray matter-white matter differentiation, sharpness, and overall diagnostic quality were also assessed and compared with the interobserver agreement.
Results: There was a gradual reduction in the image noise and artifact index of the posterior cranial fossa as the strength levels of DLIR increased (all P < 0.001) compared with that of ASIR-V. CNR in both the centrum semiovale and basal ganglia levels also improved from the low to high strength levels of DLIR compared with that of ASIR-V (all P < 0.001). DLIR images with medium and high strength levels demonstrated the best subjective image quality scores among the reconstruction datasets. There was moderate to good interobserver agreement for the subjective image quality assessments with ASIR-V and DLIR.
Conclusion: On routine brain CT scans, optimized protocols with DLIR allowed significant reduction of noise and artifacts with improved subjective image quality compared with ASIR-V.
Keywords: Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo; Brain CT; Deep learning image reconstruction; Image quality.
Similar articles
-
Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography.J Xray Sci Technol. 2022;30(3):409-418. doi: 10.3233/XST-211105. J Xray Sci Technol. 2022. PMID: 35124575 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of Deep-Learning Image Reconstruction for Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography Scan: Emphasis on Image Quality and Noise.Korean J Radiol. 2021 Jan;22(1):131-138. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0116. Epub 2020 Jul 27. Korean J Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32729277 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-reader multiparametric DECT study evaluating different strengths of iterative and deep learning-based image reconstruction techniques.Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb;35(2):885-896. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10974-3. Epub 2024 Jul 24. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39046499
-
Influence of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for reducing radiation dose and image noise compared to iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection for head and chest computed tomography examinations: a systematic review.F1000Res. 2024 Apr 15;13:274. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.147345.1. eCollection 2024. F1000Res. 2024. PMID: 38725640 Free PMC article.
-
A comprehensive survey on deep learning techniques in CT image quality improvement.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Oct;60(10):2757-2770. doi: 10.1007/s11517-022-02631-y. Epub 2022 Aug 13. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022. PMID: 35962932 Review.
Cited by
-
Quantitative and qualitative assessment of ultra-low-dose paranasal sinus CT using deep learning image reconstruction: a comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction.Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11763-2. Online ahead of print. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40514598
-
Reduced-Dose Deep Learning Reconstruction for Abdominal CT of Liver Metastases.Radiology. 2022 Apr;303(1):90-98. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211838. Epub 2022 Jan 11. Radiology. 2022. PMID: 35014900 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction on Lesion Conspicuity of Liver Metastases in Pre- and Post-contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography.J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01529-z. Online ahead of print. J Imaging Inform Med. 2025. PMID: 40355690
-
An optimized EBRSA-Bi LSTM model for highly undersampled rapid CT image reconstruction.Biomed Signal Process Control. 2023 May;83:104637. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104637. Epub 2023 Feb 8. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2023. PMID: 36776947 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning versus iterative image reconstruction algorithm for head CT in trauma.Emerg Radiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):339-352. doi: 10.1007/s10140-021-02012-2. Epub 2022 Jan 5. Emerg Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34984574 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM (2000) Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet (London, England) 355(9216):1670–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6 - DOI
-
- Hill MD, Demchuk AM, Tomsick TA, Palesch YY, Broderick JP (2006) Using the baseline CT scan to select acute stroke patients for IV-IA therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(8):1612–1616 - PubMed
-
- Heuscher DJ, Vembar M (1999) Reduced partial volume artifacts using spiral computed tomography and an integrating interpolator. Med Phys 26(2):276–286. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598523 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jones TR, Kaplan RT, Lane B, Atlas SW, Rubin GD (2001) Single- versus multi-detector row CT of the brain: quality assessment. Radiology 219(3):750–755. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn47750 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pelt DM, Batenburg KJ (2014) Improving filtered backprojection reconstruction by data-dependent filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(11):4750–4762. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2014.2341971 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources