Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;34(1):243-254.
doi: 10.1111/jhn.12811. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

Cancer cachexia: an overview of diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches for the accredited practicing dietitian

Affiliations
Review

Cancer cachexia: an overview of diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches for the accredited practicing dietitian

B S van der Meij et al. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Cancer cachexia (CC) is a multifactorial syndrome characterised by ongoing skeletal muscle loss that leads to progressive functional impairment driven by reduced food intake and abnormal metabolism. Despite the traditional use of non-volitional weight loss as the primary marker of CC, there is no consensus on how to diagnose and manage CC.

Methods: The aim of this narrative review was to describe and discuss diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches for the accredited practicing dietitian with respect to identifying and managing CC.

Results: Available diagnostic criteria for cachexia include the cancer-specific (Fearon and Cachexia Score) and general criteria (Evans and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition). These include phenotypic criteria [weight loss, body mass index, (objective) muscle mass assessments, quality of life] and aetiological criteria (disease burden, inflammation, energy expenditure, anorexia and inadequate food intake) and can be incorporated into the nutrition care process (NCP). This informs the nutrition diagnosis of 'chronic disease- or condition-related malnutrition (undernutrition) as related to increased nutrient needs, anorexia or diminished intake due to CC'. Optimal nutrition care and management of CC is multidisciplinary, corrects for increased energy expenditure (via immunonutrition/eicosapentaenoic acid), suboptimal protein/energy intake and poor nutrition quality of life, and includes a physical exercise intervention. Monitoring of intervention efficacy should focus on maintaining or slowing the loss of muscle mass, with weight change as an alternative gross indicator.

Conclusions: Dietitians and the NCP can play an essential role with respect to identifying and managing CC, focusing on aspects of nutrition screening, assessment and intervention.

Keywords: anorexia; cachexia; cancer; malnutrition; muscle mass; nutrition care process.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD et al. (2011) Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 12, 489-495.
    1. Bauer JD, Ash S, Davidson WL et al. (2006) Evidence based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of cancer cachexia. Nutr Diet 63, S3-32.
    1. Jensen GL, Mirtallo J, Compher C et al. (2010) Adult starvation and disease-related malnutrition: a proposal for etiology-based diagnosis in the clinical practice setting from the international consensus guideline committee. J Parenter Enter Nutr 34, 156-159.
    1. Laviano A & Paldino A (2014) Diagnosing cachexia. Clin Pract 11, 71-78.
    1. Evans WJ, Morley JE, Argilés J et al. (2008) Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr 27, 793-799.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources