Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Oct;19(5):e132-e139.
doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

Are facemasks a priority for all staff in theatre to prevent surgical site infections during shortages of supply? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ben A Marson  1 , Simon Craxford  2 , Ana M Valdes  3 , Benjamin J Ollivere  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Are facemasks a priority for all staff in theatre to prevent surgical site infections during shortages of supply? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ben A Marson et al. Surgeon. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The provision of facemasks must be prioritised when supplies are interrupted. These include supplies to operating rooms. The aim of this review is to evaluate the available evidence to determine the relative priority for the provision of facemasks in operating rooms to prevent surgical site infection.

Methods: A systematic search of OVID Medline, Embase & Cochrane Central was completed. Candidate full-text articles were identified and analysed by two reviewers who also assessed risk of bias.

Findings: Six studies were identified that described infections with and without facemask usage. The pooled effect of not wearing facemasks was a risk ratio for infection of 0.77 (0.62-0.97) in favour of not wearing masks. Only one case-controlled study evaluated facemask usage in implant surgery and demonstrated an odds ratio for developing infection of 3.34 (95% CI 1.94-5.74) if facemasks were not worn by the operating surgeon. Four studies collected microbiological cultures during periods in surgery with or without facemasks. Two demonstrated an increase in colony forming units in surgery where the wound was directly below the surgeon. One study showed equivocal results when masks were worn, and one was terminated early limiting interpretation.

Conclusion: The use of facemasks by scrubbed staff during implant surgery should be mandatory to prevent infection. We recommend the use of facemasks by all scrubbed staff during other forms of surgery to protect the patient and staff, but the supporting evidence is weak. There is insufficient evidence to show that non-scrubbed staff must wear masks during surgery.

Keywords: Bacterial infection; Elective surgery; Emergency surgery; Facemask; Surgical infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of included studies for the use of facemasks during all surgery.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of included studies for the use of facemasks during clean surgery.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of included studies for the use of facemasks during non-clean surgery.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Weiser T.G., Regenbogen S.E., Thompson K.D., Haynes A.B., Lipsitz S.R., Berry W.R. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet. 2008 Jul;372(9633):139–144. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . 2016. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. - PubMed
    1. AORN . 2015. Guidelines for perioperative practice. Denver.
    1. Association of Surgical Technologists . Hand Hygiene and Hand Washing; Littleton: 2008. AST standards of practice for surgical attire, surgical scrub.
    1. Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Healthcare . vol. 39. National Health Medical Research Council; 2010. p. 80. (Australian guidelines for the prevention and control of infection in healthcare).