Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan;1507(1):23-36.
doi: 10.1111/nyas.14507. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

A walk through the progression of resuscitation medicine

Affiliations
Review

A walk through the progression of resuscitation medicine

Muhammad Shoaib et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Cardiac arrest (CA) is a sudden and devastating disease process resulting in more deaths in the United States than many cancers, metabolic diseases, and even car accidents. Despite such a heavy mortality burden, effective treatments have remained elusive. The past century has been productive in establishing the guidelines for resuscitation, known as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as well as developing a scientific field whose aim is to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of CA and develop therapies to save lives. CPR has been successful in reinitiating the heart after arrest, enabling a survival rate of approximately 10% in out-of-hospital CA. Although current advanced resuscitation methods, including hypothermia and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, have improved survival in some patients, they are unlikely to significantly improve the national survival rate any further without a paradigm shift. Such a change is possible with sustained efforts in the basic and clinical sciences of resuscitation and their implementation. This review seeks to discuss the current landscape in resuscitation medicine-how we got here and where we are going.

Keywords: cardiac arrest; neuroprotection and survival; reperfusion cocktail; resuscitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Charlier, P. & D. Annane. 2018. Time for a new definition of death? Resuscitation 127: e14-e15.
    1. Maguire, A. 2019. Towards a holistic definition of death: the biological, philosophical and social deficiencies of brain stem death criteria. New Bioeth. 25: 172-184.
    1. Lewis, A., K. Cahn-Fuller & A. Caplan. 2017. Shouldn't dead be dead?: the search for a uniform definition of death. J. Law Med. Ethics 45: 112-128.
    1. Safar, P. 1996. On the history of modern resuscitation. Crit. Care Med. 24: S3-S11.
    1. Safar, P. 1963. Resuscitation: Controversial Aspects; An International Symposium Held at the First European Congress of Anaesthesiology of the World Federation of Socities of Anaesthesiologists, Vienna, Austria, September 5, 1962. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources