Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May-Jun;78(3):896-904.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

A Qualitative Analysis of Surgical Faculty and Surgical Resident Perceptions of Potential Barriers to Implementing a Novel Surgical Education Curriculum

Affiliations

A Qualitative Analysis of Surgical Faculty and Surgical Resident Perceptions of Potential Barriers to Implementing a Novel Surgical Education Curriculum

Gillian J Lee et al. J Surg Educ. 2021 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Sociocultural differences between patients and physicians affect communication, and suboptimal communication can lead to patient dissatisfaction and poor health outcomes. To mitigate disparities in surgical outcomes, the Provider Awareness and Cultural dexterity Toolkit for Surgeons was developed as a novel curriculum for surgical residents focusing on patient-centeredness and enhanced patient-clinician communication through a cultural dexterity framework. This study's objective was to examine surgical faculty and surgical resident perspectives on potential facilitators and barriers to implementing the cultural dexterity curriculum.

Design, setting, and participants: Focus groups were conducted at 2 separate academic conferences, with the curriculum provided to participants for advanced review. The first 4 focus groups consisted entirely of surgical faculty (n = 37), each with 9 to 10 participants. The next 4 focus groups consisted of surgical residents (n = 31), each with 6 to 11 participants. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed, and the data were thematically analyzed using a constant, comparative method.

Results: Three major themes emerged: (1) Departmental and hospital endorsement of the curriculum are necessary to ensure successful rollout. (2) Residents must be engaged in the curriculum in order to obtain full participation and "buy-in." (3) The application of cultural dexterity concepts in practice are influenced by systemic and institutional factors.

Conclusions: Institutional support, resident engagement, and applicability to practice are crucial considerations for the implementation of a cultural dexterity curriculum for surgical residents. These 3 tenets, as identified by surgical faculty and residents, are critical for ensuring an impactful and clinically relevant education program.

Keywords: cultural dexterity; curriculum implementation; focus groups; healthcare disparities; resident education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Similarities and Differences in Surgery Faculty and Resident Focus Groups

References

    1. Udyavar R, Smink DS, Mullen JT, et al. Qualitative Analysis of a Cultural Dexterity Program for Surgeons: Feasible, Impactful, and Necessary. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(5): 1159–1170. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.01.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weissman JS, Betancourt J, Campbell EG, et al. Resident physicians’ preparedness to provide cross-cultural care. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;294(9):1058–1067. doi:10.1001/jama.294.9.1058 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haider AH, Scott VK, Rehman KA, et al. Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: A comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors. J Am CollSurg. 2013;216(3). doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Betancourt JR, Corbett J, Bondaryk MR. Addressing Disparities and Achieving Equity Cultural Competence, Ethics, and Health-care Transformation. Chest. 2014;145(1):143–148 doi:10.1378/chest.13-0634 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beach MC, Cooper LA, Robinson KA, et al. Strategies for improving minority healthcare quality. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004;(90):1–8. doi:10.1037/e439452005-001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources