Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 15:11:566046.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566046. eCollection 2020.

Influence of Air Quality on Pro-environmental Behavior of Chinese Residents: From the Perspective of Spatial Distance

Guanghua Sheng  1 , Jiatong Dai  2 , Hong Pan  1
Affiliations

Influence of Air Quality on Pro-environmental Behavior of Chinese Residents: From the Perspective of Spatial Distance

Guanghua Sheng et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Although environmental issues have attracted public attention, there are still many people unwilling to make behavioral changes to solve the problem, which makes promoting pro-environmental behavior become an interesting research topic. This study discusses the influence of air quality on the pro-environmental behavior of Chinese residents from the perspective of spatial distance, providing a theoretical basis and practical application for improving pro-environmental behavior. Through three experiments, this study reveals that air pollution within the local spatial distance could make residents more willing to conduct pro-environmental behavior. In addition, we also find that air pollution within local spatial distance would stimulate residents' environmental affection and promote them to conduct pro-environmental behavior. That is, environmental affection plays a mediating role in the interactive effect of air quality and spatial distance on pro-environmental behavior.

Keywords: Chinese residents; air quality; environmental affection; pro-environmental behavior; spatial distance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Framework.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A–C) Main effect analysis of Experiment 1.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A–C) Main effect analysis of Experiment 2.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Mediation analysis of Experiment 2. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
(A–C) Main effect analysis of Experiment 3.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Mediation analysis of Experiment 3. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agarwal J., Malhotra N. K. (2005). An integrated model of attitude and affect: theoretical foundation and an empirical investigation. J. Bus. Res. 58 483–493. 10.1016/s0148-2963(03)00138-3 - DOI
    1. Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T - DOI
    1. Bar-Anan Y., Liberman N., Trope Y., Algom D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136 610–622. 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbaro N., Pickett S. M. (2016). Mindfully green: examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Pers. Individ. Dif. 93 137–142. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.026 - DOI
    1. Bissing-Olson M. J., Fielding K. S., Iyer A. (2016). Experiences of pride, not guilt, predict pro-environmental behavior when pro-environmental descriptive norms are more positive. J. Environ. Psychol. 45 145–153. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.001 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources