Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 11:11:969.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00969. eCollection 2020.

The Flip Side of Distractibility-Executive Dysfunction in Functional Movement Disorders

Affiliations

The Flip Side of Distractibility-Executive Dysfunction in Functional Movement Disorders

Anne-Catherine M L Huys et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Attention plays a crucial role in functional neurological disorders. Attention to the symptoms leads to their exacerbation and distraction to their improvement or even transitory disappearance. Objective: The aim was to test if the alerting, orienting and particularly the executive aspect of attention are affected in functional movement disorders. Methods: Thirty patients with a functional movement disorder, 30 patients with an organic movement disorder and 30 healthy controls performed the attention network test. Results: The alerting and orienting effects were normal, but executive control of attention under conflict was abnormal in patients with functional movement disorders, compared to patients with an organic movement disorder and healthy controls. Conclusion: Executive dysfunction seems to be an important secondary feature of functional movement disorders, due to the overutilization of attentional resources for explicit movement control. Furthermore, it provides an explanation for seemingly unrelated symptoms commonly associated with functional movement disorders, such as concentration difficulties and fatigue.

Keywords: attention; attention network test; cognitive; conversion disorder; executive; functional movement disorders; functional neurological disorder; movement disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Attention network test experimental setup.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alerting, orienting and conflict effect group averages. Statistically significant Šidák-Holm corrected results are marked by asterisks: * pcorr < 0.05, ** pcorr < 0.001. The standard error of the mean is shown by the error bars.

References

    1. Kastner S. Visual attention. In: Gazzaniga MS, Mangun GR. editors. The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; (2014) p. 163–5.
    1. Schwingenschuh P, Katschnig P, Seiler S, Saifee TA, Aguirregomozcorta M, Cordivari C, et al. . Moving toward laboratory-supported criteria for psychogenic tremor. Mov Disord. (2011) 26:2509–15. 10.1002/mds.23922 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edwards MJ, Fotopoulou A, Pareés I. Neurobiology of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders. Curr Opin Neurol. (2013) 26:442–7. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283633953 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Espay AJ, Lang AE. Phenotype-specific diagnosis of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2015) 15:32. 10.1007/s11910-015-0556-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edwards MJ, Rothwell JC. Losing focus: how paying attention can be bad for movement. Mov Disord. (2011) 26:1969–70. 10.1002/mds.23920 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources