Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 8:5:25.
doi: 10.1186/s40834-020-00131-8. eCollection 2020.

Determinants of female sterilization method uptake among women of reproductive age group in Uganda

Affiliations

Determinants of female sterilization method uptake among women of reproductive age group in Uganda

Paula Anita et al. Contracept Reprod Med. .

Abstract

Background: Despite its great effectiveness, safety and convenience for women who do not wish to have more children; female sterilization method uptake in Uganda is very low. This study aimed at establishing factors associated with female sterilization uptake in Uganda.

Methods: Secondary data were sourced from the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS). We analyzed all (18,506) women aged 15-49 years who were interviewed in the 2016 UDHS. This sample was categorized into women who were sterilized and those using other modern methods. We used a Chi-square test to measure the association between the current uptake of female sterilization by the women and selected independent variables. Multivariate analysis applied the complimentary log-log model to determine the net effect of selected characteristics on female sterilization uptake in Uganda.

Results: The overall prevalence of female sterilization among modern contraceptive users was 2%. Female sterilization uptake was highly associated with age of 30 years and older (OR = 34.49;, 95%CI:13.33-99.88), middle wealth status (OR = 0.65, 95% CI:0.47-0.92), women who had ever given birth to at least four children (OR = 3.19, 95% CI:1.63-6.22) and decision making by either the husband/partner (OR = 2.42, 95% CI:1.55-3.78) or jointly between a woman and her husband/partner (OR = 1.38, 95% CI:1.02-1.86).

Conclusions: The uptake of female sterilization was very low, and this was associated with; age, household wealth, parity and contraceptive decision-maker. The uptake of Family planning programs needs to focus on male engagement to increase joint decision making on family planning issues especially those relating to fertility limitation. Government and its other implementing partners need to scale-up efforts that increase accessibility to information on female sterilization services for women who have completed their fertility.

Keywords: Contraceptive decision-making; Female sterilization; Tubal ligation prevalence; Uganda.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Melka AS, Tekelab T, Wirtu D. Determinants of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods utilization among married women of reproductive age groups in western Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;21:246. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.246.5835. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patil E, Jensen JT. Permanent contraception for women. Semin Reprod Med. 2016;34:139–144. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571434. - DOI - PubMed
    1. United Nations. Trends in contraceptive use worldwide. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2015.
    1. Mota K, Reddy S, Getachew B. Unmet need of long-acting and permanent family planning methods among women in the reproductive age group in shashemene town, Oromia region, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0209-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dennis O. Allagoa, Nyengidiki Tamunomie Kennedy, Kotingo E.L, Kotingo E, Allagoa D, Tamunomie N. evolving trends in female sterilization. A review article. Elit Res J Med Med Sci. 2014;2:11–16.

LinkOut - more resources