Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 15:10:561598.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.561598. eCollection 2020.

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Localized Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Affiliations

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Localized Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Muyun Peng et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Routine clinical surveillance involves serial radiographic imaging following radical surgery in localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, such surveillance can detect only macroscopic disease recurrence and is frequently inconclusive. We investigated if detection of ctDNA before and after resection of NSCLC identifies the patients with risk of relapse, and furthermore, informs about response to management.

Methods: We recruited a total of 77 NSCLC patients. A high-throughput 127 target-gene capture technology and a high-sensitivity circulating single-molecule amplification and resequencing technology (cSMART) assay were used to detect the somatic mutations in the tumor tissues as well as the plasma of NSCLC patients before and after surgery to monitor for minimal residual disease (MRD). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate the relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with predictor variables.

Results: Patients with a higher stage (III/IV) and preoperative ctDNA-positive status demonstrated a significant 2.8-3.4-fold risk and 3.8-4.0-fold risk for recurrence and death, respectively. Preoperative ctDNA-positive patients associated with a lower RFS (HR = 3.812, p = 0.0005) and OS (HR = 5.004, p = 0.0009). Postoperative ctDNA-positive patients also associated with a lower RFS (HR = 3.076, p = 0.0015) and OS (HR = 3.195, p = 0.0053). Disease recurrence occurred among 63.3% (19/30) of postoperative ctDNA-positive patients. Most of these patients 89.5% (17/19) had detectable ctDNA within 2 weeks after surgery and was identified in advance of radiographic findings by a median of 12.6 months.

Conclusion: Advanced stage and preoperative ctDNA-positive are strong predictors of RFS and OS in localized NSCLC patients undergoing complete resection. Postoperative detection of ctDNA increases chance to detect early relapse, thus can fulfill an important role in stratifying patients for immediate further treatment with adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy.

Keywords: circulating single molecule amplification and re-sequencing technology; circulating tumor DNA; minimal residual disease; non-small cell lung cancer; prognostic biomarker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Consort diagram of patient enrollment, specimen collection and clinical management.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Fraction of patients with detectable preoperative ctDNA in NSCLC at cancer stage I∼IV. (B) Fraction of patients with detectable postoperative ctDNA in NSCLC at cancer stage I∼IV. (C) Characteristics associated with positive preoperative ctDNA. (D) Negative conversion ratio of preoperative ctDNA at cancer stage I∼III.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) Kaplan–Meier estimates of recurrence-free survival (RFS) for all assessable patients undergoing curative intent surgery for early NSCLC cancer, stratified by pre-operative ctDNA status: detectable (positive) versus undetectable (negative). (B) Kaplan–Meier estimate for overall survival (OS) for matched patients, stratified by pre-operative ctDNA status. (C) Kaplan–Meier estimates for RFS, stratified by postoperative ctDNA status. (D) Kaplan–Meier estimates for OS, stratified by post-operative ctDNA status. (E,F) Kaplan–Meier estimates for RFS (E) and OS (F) for patients’ whose ctDNA status changes from detectable (positive) pre-operatively to undetectable (negative) post-operatively compared with patients whose ctDNA status remains undetectable (negative) both pre- and post-operatively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. (2019) 69:7–34. 10.3322/caac.21551 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hong TH, Kim J, Shin S, Kim HK, Choi YS, Zo JI, et al. Clinical outcomes of microscopic residual disease after bronchial sleeve resection for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thoracic Cardiovas Surgery. (2020). S0022–5223:30518-3. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.079 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murtaza M, Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, Gale D, Forshew T, Piskorz AM, et al. Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA. Nature. (2013) 497:108–12. 10.1038/nature12065 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, Murtaza M, Biggs H, Rueda OM, Chin SF, et al. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. New Engl J Med. (2013) 368:1199–209. 10.1056/NEJMoa1213261 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources