Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 11:8:544.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00544. eCollection 2020.

Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms Examine Healthcare Providers' Perceptions and Longitudinal Performance in a Digital Neonatal Resuscitation Simulator

Affiliations

Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms Examine Healthcare Providers' Perceptions and Longitudinal Performance in a Digital Neonatal Resuscitation Simulator

Chang Lu et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Frequent simulation-based education is recommended to improve health outcomes during neonatal resuscitation but is often inaccessible due to time, resource, and personnel requirements. Digital simulation presents a potential alternative; however, its effectiveness and reception by healthcare professionals (HCPs) remains largely unexplored. Objectives: This study explores HCPs' attitudes toward a digital simulator, technology, and mindset to elucidate their effects on neonatal resuscitation performance in simulation-based assessments. Methods: The study was conducted from April to August 2019 with 2-month (June-October 2019) and 5-month (September 2019-January 2020) follow-up at a tertiary perinatal center in Edmonton, Canada. Of 300 available neonatal HCPs, 50 participated. Participants completed a demographic survey, a pretest, two practice scenarios using the RETAIN neonatal resuscitation digital simulation, a posttest, and an attitudinal survey (100% response rate). Participants repeated the posttest scenario in 2 months (86% response rate) and completed another posttest scenario using a low-fidelity, tabletop simulator (80% response rate) 5 months after the initial study intervention. Participants' survey responses were collected to measure attitudes toward digital simulation and technology. Knowledge was assessed at baseline (pretest), acquisition (posttest), retention (2-month posttest), and transfer (5-month posttest). Results: Fifty neonatal HCPs participated in this study (44 females and 6 males; 27 nurses, 3 nurse practitioners, 14 respiratory therapists, and 6 doctors). Most participants reported technology in medical education as useful and beneficial. Three attitudinal clusters were identified by a hierarchical clustering algorithm based on survey responses. Although participants exhibited diverse attitudinal paths, they all improved neonatal resuscitation performance after using the digital simulator and successfully transferred their knowledge to a new medium. Conclusions: Digital simulation improved HCPs' neonatal resuscitation performance. Medical education may benefit by incorporating technology during simulation training.

Keywords: digital simulator; education; medical education; resuscitation; serious games; simulation; table-top simulator; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The binary (A) and 5-item Likert (B) survey items.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Optimal number of clusters (k) decided by the Elbow method (A) and the Silhouette method (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cluster dendrogram on the cluster membership for each participant.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The estimated marginal means of performance scores by clusters.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Guinsburg R, et al. . Part 7: Neonatal resuscitation. Circulation. (2015) 132:S204–S41. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000276 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, Kapadia VS, Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, et al. . Part 13: Neonatal resuscitation: 2015 american heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. (2015) 132(18 Suppl 2):543. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000267 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scalese RJ, Obeso VT, Issenberg SB. Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. (2008) 23:46–49. 10.1007/s11606-007-0283-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janssen A, Shaw T, Goodyear P, Kerfoot BP, Bryce D. A little healthy competition: using mixed methods to pilot a team-based digital game for boosting medical student engagement with anatomy and histology content. BMC Med Educ. (2015) 15:173 10.1186/s12909-015-0455-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friedman CP. The marvelous medical education machine or how medical education can be 'unstuck' in time. Med Teach. (2000) 22:496–502. 10.1080/01421590050110786 - DOI - PubMed