Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 3;7(7):750-762.
doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13052. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Can Autonomic Testing and Imaging Contribute to the Early Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy? A Systematic Review and Recommendations by the Movement Disorder Society Multiple System Atrophy Study Group

Maria Teresa Pellecchia  1 , Iva Stankovic  2 , Alessandra Fanciulli  3 , Florian Krismer  3 , Wassilios G Meissner  4 , Jose-Alberto Palma  5 , Jalesh N Panicker  6   7 , Klaus Seppi  3 , Gregor K Wenning  3 ; Members of the Movement Disorder Society Multiple System Atrophy Study Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Can Autonomic Testing and Imaging Contribute to the Early Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy? A Systematic Review and Recommendations by the Movement Disorder Society Multiple System Atrophy Study Group

Maria Teresa Pellecchia et al. Mov Disord Clin Pract. .

Abstract

Background: In the current consensus diagnostic criteria, the diagnosis of probable multiple system atrophy (MSA) is based solely on clinical findings, whereas neuroimaging findings are listed as aid for the diagnosis of possible MSA. There are overlapping phenotypes between MSA-parkinsonian type and Parkinson's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and dementia with Lewy bodies, and between MSA-cerebellar type and sporadic adult-onset ataxia resulting in a significant diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis of MSA during life.

Objectives: In light of an ongoing effort to revise the current consensus criteria for MSA, the Movement Disorders Society Multiple System Atrophy Study Group performed a systematic review of original articles published before August 2019.

Methods: We included articles that studied at least 10 patients with MSA as well as participants with another disorder or control group for comparison purposes. MSA was defined by neuropathological confirmation, or as clinically probable, or clinically probable plus possible according to consensus diagnostic criteria.

Results: We discuss the pitfalls and benefits of each diagnostic test and provide specific recommendations on how to evaluate patients in whom MSA is suspected.

Conclusions: This systematic review of relevant studies indicates that imaging and autonomic function tests significantly contribute to increasing the accuracy of a diagnosis of MSA.

Keywords: diagnostic tests; multiple system atrophy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fanciulli A, Wenning G. Multiple system atrophy. N Engl J Med 2015;372(3):249–263. - PubMed
    1. Gilman S, Wenning G, Low P, et al. Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology 2008;71(9):670–676. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Litvan I, Goetz C, Jankovic J, et al. What is the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy? Arch Neurol 1997;54(8):937–944. - PubMed
    1. Koga S, Aoki N, Uitti R, et al. When DLB, PD, and PSP masquerade as MSA. Neurology 2015;85(5):404–412. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miki Y, Foti SC, Asi YT. Improving diagnostic accuracy of multiple system atrophy: a clinicopathological study. Brain 2019;142(9):2813–2827. - PubMed