Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):284-293.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa197.

Putting the social back into sociotechnical: Case studies of co-design in digital health

Chrysanthi Papoutsi  1 , Joseph Wherton  1 , Sara Shaw  1 , Clare Morrison  2 , Trisha Greenhalgh  1
Affiliations

Putting the social back into sociotechnical: Case studies of co-design in digital health

Chrysanthi Papoutsi et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: We sought to examine co-design in 3 contrasting case studies of technology-supported change in health care and explain its role in influencing project success.

Materials and methods: Longitudinal case studies of a seizure detection and reporting technology for epilepsy (Southern England, 2018-2019), a telehealth service for heart failure (7 UK sites, 2016-2018), and a remote video consultation service (Scotland-wide, 2019-2020). We carried out interviews with 158 participants and collected more than 200 pages of field notes from observations. Within- and cross-case analysis was informed by sociotechnical theory.

Results: In the epilepsy case, co-design prioritized patient-facing features and focused closely around a specific clinic, which led to challenges with sustainability and mainstreaming. In the heart failure case, patient-focused co-design produced an accessible and usable patient portal but resulted in variation in uptake between clinical sites. Successful scale-up of video consultations was explained by a co-design process involving not only the technical interface, but also careful reshaping of work practices.

Discussion: A shift is needed from co-designing with technology users to co-designing with patients as service users, and with healthcare staff as professionals. Good co-design needs to involve users, including those who engage with the technology-supported service bothdirectly and indirectly. It requires sensitivity to emergence and unpredictability in complex systems. Healthcare staff need to be supported to accommodate iterative change in the service. Adequate resourcing and infrastructures for systems-focused co-design are essential.

Conclusions: If co-design focuses narrowly on the technology, opportunities will be missed to coevolve technologies alongside clinical practices and organizational routines.

Keywords: co-design; sociotechnical theory. video consultations; telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Unertl KM, Schaefbauer CL, Campbell TR, et al.Integrating community-based participatory research and informatics approaches to improve the engagement and health of underserved populations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (1): 60–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T.. Achieving research impact through co‐creation in community‐based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q 2016; 94 (2): 392–429. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simonsen J, Robertson T.. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. London: Routledge; 2012.
    1. Collins S, Dykes P, Bates DW, et al.An informatics research agenda to support patient and family empowerment and engagement in care and recovery during and after hospitalization. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (2): 206–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thabrew H, Fleming TM, Hetrick S, Merry SN.. Co-design of eHealth interventions with children and young people. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9: 481. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types