Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;18(6):646-654.
doi: 10.1007/s11914-020-00628-w. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

Sex Differences in Cancer Cachexia

Affiliations
Review

Sex Differences in Cancer Cachexia

Xiaoling Zhong et al. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Cachexia, a feature of cancer and other chronic diseases, is marked by progressive weight loss and skeletal muscle wasting. This review aims to highlight the sex differences in manifestations of cancer cachexia in patients, rodent models, and our current understanding of the potential mechanisms accounting for these differences.

Recent findings: Male cancer patients generally have higher prevalence of cachexia, greater weight loss or muscle wasting, and worse outcomes compared with female cancer patients. Knowledge is increasing about sex differences in muscle fiber type and function, mitochondrial metabolism, global gene expression and signaling pathways, and regulatory mechanisms at the levels of sex chromosomes vs. sex hormones; however, it is largely undetermined how such sex differences directly affect the susceptibility to stressors leading to muscle wasting in cancer cachexia. Few studies have investigated basic mechanisms underlying sex differences in cancer cachexia. A better understanding of sex differences would improve cachexia treatment in both sexes.

Keywords: Animals; Cachexia/etiology; Cachexia/pathology; Humans; Neoplasms/complications; Sex characteristics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Xiaoling Zhong and Teresa Zimmers declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of sex difference in cancer cachexia phenotypes. Shown are the observations with clearer sex differences. Italics, the difference is not conclusive or not documented in cancer cachexia

References

    1. Lena A, Ebner N, Anker MS. Cardiac cachexia. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019;21(Suppl L):L24–LL7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dudgeon D, Baracos VE. Physiological and functional failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure and cancer: a debilitating intersection of sarcopenia, cachexia and breathlessness. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2016;10(3):236–241. - PubMed
    1. Moorthi RN, Avin KG. Clinical relevance of sarcopenia in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2017;26(3):219–228. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baracos VE, Martin L, Korc M, Guttridge DC, Fearon KCH. Cancer-associated cachexia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:17105. - PubMed
    1. Zimmers TA, Koniaris LG. Modelling survival. Elife. 2019;8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types