Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Nov;40(8):906-910.
doi: 10.1002/micr.30664. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

Custom designed radial forearm free flap for reconstruction of nasomaxillary defects: Report of two cases

Affiliations
Case Reports

Custom designed radial forearm free flap for reconstruction of nasomaxillary defects: Report of two cases

Ramon Sieira-Gil et al. Microsurgery. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Nasal amputation and nasomaxillary defects, need to reconstruct the internal lining, osteochondral structure, and external coating of the nose. Authors report a 70-year-old male and a 65-year-old female treated for nasomaxillary defects (Brown JS, Shaw RJ. The Lancet Oncology 2010;11:1001-1008) due to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) where the tip of the nose was preserved. A new custom design of the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) consisting on a subcutaneous tissue (SCT) component, a skin paddle for the internal nasal vault lining, and a skin paddle for the external nasal skin coating was raised to treat both total thickness nasal defects. The dimension of each skin paddle corresponds to the defect measurements. The skin incisions of the custom design correspond to those of a conventional RFFF. The SCT component was harvested in a subcutaneous plane continuously with the skin island for the internal nasal lining which is drawn on the ulnar skin of the forearm. The component for the external nasal coating was drawn on the radial skin area of the flap. No postoperative complications and a satisfactory outcome was reported after 1 year of follow-up. This new custom design of the RFFF is described for reconstruction of nasomaxillary defects when the tip of the nose is preserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Brown, J. S., & Shaw, R. J. (2010). Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface: Introducing a new classification. The Lancet Oncology, 11(10), 1001-1008.
    1. Brunetti, B., Tenna, S., Barone, M., Cassotta, G., Casale, M., & Persichetti, P. (2019). Bipaddle chimaeric forehead flap: A new technique for simultaneous lining and cutaneous reconstruction in case of full thickness defects of the nose. Microsurgery, 39(2), 124-130.
    1. Burget, G. C., & Menick, F. J. (1985). The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery., 76(2), 239-247.
    1. Burget, G. C., & Menick, F. J. (1989). Nasal support and lining: The marriage of beauty and blood supply. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery., 84(2), 189-202.
    1. Fujioka, M., Hayashida, K., Murakami, C., & Koga, Y. (2012). Reconstruction of total nasal defect including skin, bone, and lining, using a single free radial forearm osteocutaneous perforator flap. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery., 129(5), 854e-857e.

Publication types