Olfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID-19-Related Anosmia
- PMID: 33045908
- PMCID: PMC7554408
- DOI: 10.1177/0194599820965920
Olfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID-19-Related Anosmia
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the differences in olfactory cleft (OC) morphology in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) anosmia compared to control subjects and postviral anosmia related to infection other than severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Study design: Prospective.
Setting: This study comprises 91 cases, including 24 cases with anosmia due to SARS-CoV-2, 38 patients with olfactory dysfunction (OD) due to viral infection other than SARS-CoV-2, and a control group of 29 normosmic cases.
Methods: All cases had paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT), and cases with OD had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dedicated to the olfactory nerve. The OC width and volumes were measured on CT, and T2-weighted signal intensity (SI), olfactory bulb volumes, and olfactory sulcus depths were assessed on MRI.
Results: This study showed 3 major findings: the right and left OC widths were significantly wider in anosmic patients due to SARS-CoV-2 (group 1) or OD due to non-SARS-CoV-2 viral infection (group 2) when compared to healthy controls. OC volumes were significantly higher in group 1 or 2 than in healthy controls, and T2 SI of OC area was higher in groups 1 and 2 than in healthy controls. There was no significant difference in olfactory bulb volumes and olfactory sulcus depths on MRI among groups 1 and 2.
Conclusion: In this study, patients with COVID-19 anosmia had higher OC widths and volumes compared to control subjects. In addition, there was higher T2 SI of the olfactory bulb in COVID-19 anosmia compared to control subjects, suggesting underlying inflammatory changes. There was a significant negative correlation between these morphological findings and threshold discrimination identification scores.
Level of evidence: Level 4.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Sniffin’ Sticks; anosmia; olfactory cleft; volume; width.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




Similar articles
-
Olfactory Bulb MRI and Paranasal Sinus CT Findings in Persistent COVID-19 Anosmia.Acad Radiol. 2021 Jan;28(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Oct 19. Acad Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33132007 Free PMC article.
-
Association of olfactory training with olfactory bulb morphology in adults with post-viral long-lasting olfactory dysfunction: A COVID-19 related prospective study.Auris Nasus Larynx. 2025 Feb;52(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2025.01.006. Epub 2025 Jan 21. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2025. PMID: 39971413
-
Comparison of Olfactory Cleft Width and Volumes in Patients with COVID-19 Anosmia and COVID-19 Cases Without Anosmia.ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2022;84(1):1-9. doi: 10.1159/000518672. Epub 2021 Sep 21. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2022. PMID: 34569549 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Anosmia: High Prevalence, Plural Neuropathogenic Mechanisms, and Scarce Neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2?Viruses. 2021 Nov 4;13(11):2225. doi: 10.3390/v13112225. Viruses. 2021. PMID: 34835030 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Molecular Basis of Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19 and Long COVID.Lifestyle Genom. 2024;17(1):42-56. doi: 10.1159/000539292. Epub 2024 May 15. Lifestyle Genom. 2024. PMID: 38749402 Review.
Cited by
-
Long COVID-19-related and non-COVID-19 postviral olfactory dysfunction a comparative MRI study focusing on the olfactory cleft and bulbs.Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1535699. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1535699. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2025. PMID: 39882367 Free PMC article.
-
Pathogenesis of Olfactory Disorders in COVID-19.Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 27;12(4):449. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040449. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35447981 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neuroradiological Basis of COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Laryngoscope. 2022 Jun;132(6):1260-1274. doi: 10.1002/lary.30078. Epub 2022 Mar 22. Laryngoscope. 2022. PMID: 35318656 Free PMC article.
-
Olfactory system measurements in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuroradiology. 2023 Jan;65(1):25-39. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-03014-8. Epub 2022 Jul 18. Neuroradiology. 2023. PMID: 35843987 Free PMC article.
-
Olfactory cleft stenosis and obstruction on paranasal sinus CT scan in pre-septo-rhinoplasty patients: normal variants or pathologic findings?Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug;34(8):5339-5348. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10564-9. Epub 2024 Jan 11. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38206402
References
-
- Cheng X, Liu J, Li N, et al.. Otolaryngology providers must be alert for patients with mild and asymptomatic COVID-19. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;162:809-810. - PubMed
-
- Tong JY, Wong A, Zhu D, Fastenberg JH, Tham T. The prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163:3-11. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous