Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;124(2):399-406.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01076-0. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Survival of patients with deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer in the pre-immunotherapy era

Affiliations

Survival of patients with deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer in the pre-immunotherapy era

G Emerens Wensink et al. Br J Cancer. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR mCRC) benefit from immunotherapy. Interpretation of the single-arm immunotherapy trials is complicated by insignificant survival data during systemic non-immunotherapy. We present survival data on a large, comprehensive cohort of dMMR mCRC patients, treated with or without systemic non-immunotherapy.

Methods: Two hundred and eighty-one dMMR mCRC patients (n = 54 from three prospective Phase 3 CAIRO trials; n = 227 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry). Overall survival was analysed from diagnosis of mCRC (OS), from initiation of first-line (OS1) and second-line (OS2) systemic treatment. Cox regression analysis examined prognostic factors. As comparison for OS 2746 MMR proficient mCRC patients were identified.

Results: Of 281 dMMR patients, 62% received first-line and 26% second-line treatment. Median OS was 16.0 months (13.8-19.6) with antitumour therapy and 2.5 months (1.8-3.5) in untreated patients. OS1 was 12.8 months (10.7-15.2) and OS2 6.2 months (5.4-8.9) in treated dMMR patients. Treated dMMR patients had a 7.6-month shorter median OS than pMMR patients.

Conclusion: Available data from immunotherapy trials lack a control arm with standard systemic treatment. Given the poor outcome compared to the immunotherapy results, our data strongly suggest a survival benefit of immunotherapy in dMMR mCRC patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. J.W.B.G. Institutional financial instructs (IFI): BMS, Pierre Fabre, Roche, MSD, Shire, Amgen; M.K. IFI: Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Merck-Serono, Nordic Farma, Roche, Servier, Sirtex, Sanofi-Aventis; Non-financial interests (NFI): advisory role ZON-MW, daily board member DCCG, P.I. PLCRC; CJAP IFI: Amgen, Roche; J.M.L.R. IFI: Servier, Merck, Bayer; T.v.V. NFI: Pfizer, Ipsen, Astellas, Roche, Bayer; H.V. IFI: Immunovo, Glycostem, Roche; G.R.V. IFI: Servier, Bayer, Merck, BMS, Lilly. All grants were unrelated to the study and paid to the individual’s institution.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flow diagram of Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) patients.
All NCR patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were assessed for eligibility. Patients were excluded if mismatch repair (MMR) status was unknown or proficient MMR (pMMR) and if patients received immunotherapy during treatment. The final population-based cohort consists of 227 patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) mCRC.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. OS, OS1 and OS2 in mCRC patients with dMMR.
Predicted overall survival (OS) using Kaplan–Meier curves with confidence intervals, examined for the cohort as a whole and in patients who received systemic treatment. a OS from metastatic disease in the unselected dMMR cohort (n = 279), stratified by having received antitumour therapy (n = 207) versus no antitumour therapy (n = 72), b Overall survival from first-line systemic therapy initiation (OS1) in first-line patients (n = 170), c Overall survival from second-line systemic therapy initiation (OS2) in second-line patients (n = 70). The risk tables display the number of patients at risk and the number of censored patients. Median survival is indicated with a vertical dashed line in each plot and is indicated with 95% confidence interval lower and upper ranges in the legend.

References

    1. Venderbosch S, Nagtegaal ID, Maughan TS, Smith CG, Cheadle JP, Fisher D, et al. Mismatch repair status and BRAF mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS studies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20:5322–5330. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0332. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gelsomino F, Barbolini M, Spallanzani A, Pugliese G, Cascinu S. The evolving role of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a review. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2016;51:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen R, Buhard O, Cervera P, Hain E, Dumont S, Andre T. Clinical and molecular characterisation of hereditary and sporadic metastatic colorectal cancers harbouring microsatellite instability/DNA mismatch repair deficiency. Eur. J. Cancer. 2017;86:266–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim CG, Ahn JB, Jung M, Beom SH, Kim C, Kim JH, et al. Effects of microsatellite instability on recurrence patterns and outcomes in colorectal cancers. Br. J. Cancer. 2016;115:25–33. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.161. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aasebø K, Dragomir A, Sundström M, Mezheyeuski A, Edqvist PH, Eide GE, et al. Consequences of a high incidence of microsatellite instability and BRAF-mutated tumors: a population-based cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Med. 2019;8:3623–3635. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances