Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;123(1):61-70.
doi: 10.1002/jso.26248. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

Metaplastic breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic considerations

Affiliations

Metaplastic breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic considerations

Giovanni Corso et al. J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare condition of breast tumor with different subtypes, considered a disease with worse prognosis; treatments and survival are often unclear and conflicting.

Methods: We consecutively collected 153 primary MBCs of different subtypes. Breast surgery, neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment, clinic-pathological factors, number and type of events during follow-up were considered to evaluate overall survival (OS) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS).

Results: The majority of MBC was triple-negative (TN) subtype (88.7%), G3 (95.3%), pN0 (70.6%), and with high levels of Ki-67 (93.5%). For OS and IDFS, no significant associations were seen between the different MBC subtypes. The matched triple-negative MBC (TNMBC) and ductal TNBC cohorts had similar prognosis both in terms of OS (p = .411) and IDFS (p = .981). We observed a positive trend for TNMBC patients treated in the adjuvant setting with the cyclofosfamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil protocol for better OS (p = .090) and IDFS (p = .087). A poor or absent response rate was observed in the neoadjuvant setting.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that metaplastic and ductal breast cancers with TN phenotype are similar in terms of overall and disease-free survival. Metaplastic cancers are poorly responsive to neoadjuvant treatment, and in the absence of novel targeted therapies, surgical treatment remains the first choice.

Keywords: breast cancer prognosis; chemotherapy treatment; metaplastic breast cancer; primary surgery; triple-negative histotype.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Moreno AC, Lin YH, Bedrosian I, Shen Y, Babiera GV, Shaitelman SF. Outcomes after treatment of metaplastic versus other breast cancer subtypes. J Cancer. 2020;11:1341-1350.
    1. Ong CT, Campbell BM, Thomas SM, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer treatment and outcomes in 2500 patients: a retrospective analysis of a National Oncology Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2249-2260.
    1. Polamraju P, Haque W, Cao K, et al. Comparison of outcomes between metaplastic and triple-negative breast cancer patients. Breast. 2020;49:8-16.
    1. Metaplastic carcinoma. Volume 2: breast tumours. WHO classification of tumours. International Agency for Research Cancer: 5th Edition. 2019.
    1. He X, Ji J, Dong R, et al. Prognosis in different subtypes of metaplastic breast cancer: a population-based analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173:329-341.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources