Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;49(1):1-16.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01217-3. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Urine and stone analysis for the investigation of the renal stone former: a consensus conference

Affiliations

Urine and stone analysis for the investigation of the renal stone former: a consensus conference

James C Williams Jr et al. Urolithiasis. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

The Consensus Group deliberated on a number of questions concerning urine and stone analysis over a period of months, and then met to develop consensus. The Group concluded that analyses of urine and stones should be routine in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stone diseases. At present, the 24-h urine is the most useful type of urine collection, and accepted methods for analysis are described. Patient education is also important for obtaining a proper urine sample. Graphical methods for reporting urine analysis results can be helpful both for the physician and for educating the patient as to proper dietary changes that could be beneficial. Proper analysis of stones is also essential for diagnosis and management of patients. The Consensus Group also agreed that research has shown that evaluation of urinary crystals could be very valuable, but the Group also recognizes that existing methods for assessment of crystalluria do not allow this to be part of stone treatment in many places.

Keywords: Crystalluria; Nephrolithiasis; Stone analysis; Urine analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J. Asplin is an employee of Labcorp/Litholink; and D.S. Goldfarb is owner and patent holder with Dr. Arnie’s, Inc., and is a consultant/researcher with Alnylam, Retrophin, Synlogic, and Dicerna. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Examples of urine analysis reports that include graphical features to aid in interpretation. a Part of the LithoLink report (Laboratory Corporation of America, Burlington, NC, USA) for 24-h urine results. Note that measures that are out of the normal range are highlighted both by a change in background colour and an increase in the size and boldness of the typeface. The history of the patient is also shown, with the most recent results on the top line. Note that in this case, the patient has significantly increased the urine volume, and thereby reduced the supersaturation value for calcium oxalate (SS CaOx). However, this was done along with a dramatic increase in dietary salt (Na 24), which likely led to the increase in urine calcium (Ca 24), which was part of what drove an increase in the supersaturation value for calcium phosphate (SS CaP). b Part of the graphical report for urine results from the LITHOSCREEN system for assessing stone patients [29]. Note that targeted values (least likely to lead to a stone recurrence) are at the centre of the diagram, in the green bull’s eye. PSF indicates the Robertson biochemical risk of forming stones as described above under Q12. The initial untreated PSF values for the patient are shown in the purple lines and shape, and the values after treatment are shown in light blue. Before treatment, this patient was at risk of forming both uric acid and calcium oxalate stones or a mixture of the two. Following suitable dietary treatment, the PSF values of the patient all fell into the green bull’s eye. Similar target diagrams are also available for both 24-h urine and dietary composition [29]

Comment in

  • "Trust my morphology", the key message from a kidney stone.
    Pozdzik A, Van Haute C, Maalouf N, Letavernier E, Williams JC, Sakhaee K. Pozdzik A, et al. Urolithiasis. 2021 Oct;49(5):493-494. doi: 10.1007/s00240-021-01280-4. Epub 2021 Jul 23. Urolithiasis. 2021. PMID: 34297156 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K. EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. Arnhem: EAU Guidelines Office; 2018.
    1. Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG, Curhan G, Denu-Ciocca CJ, Matlaga BR, Monga M, Penniston KL, Preminger GM, Turk TM, White JR. Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014;192:316–324. - PubMed
    1. Dion M, Ankawi G, Chew B, Paterson R, Sultan N, Hoddinott P, Razvi H. CUA guideline on the evaluation and medical management of the kidney stone patient—2016 update. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016;10:E347–e358. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taguchi K, Cho SY, Ng AC, Usawachintachit M, Tan YK, Deng YL, Shen CH, Gyawali P, Alenezi H, Basiri A, Bou S, Djojodemedjo T, Sarica K, Shi L, Singam P, Singh SK, Yasui T. The Urological Association of Asia clinical guideline for urinary stone disease. Int J Urol. 2019;26(7):688–709. - PubMed
    1. Ganesan C, Thomas IC, Song S, Sun AJ, Sohlberg EM, Kurella Tamura M, Chertow GM, Liao JC, Conti S, Elliott CS, Leppert JT, Pao AC. Prevalence of twenty-four hour urine testing in Veterans with urinary stone disease. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0220768. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances