Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;35(9):5203-5216.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08015-3. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Treatment of achalasia in the bariatric surgery population: a systematic review and single-institution experience

Affiliations

Treatment of achalasia in the bariatric surgery population: a systematic review and single-institution experience

Trevor D Crafts et al. Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Although the link between achalasia and morbid obesity is unclear, the reported prevalence is 0.5-1% in this population. For bariatric surgery patients, optimal type and timing of achalasia intervention is uncertain.

Methods: Patient charts from a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. Between 2012 and 2019, 245 patients were diagnosed with achalasia, 13 of whom underwent bariatric surgery and were included. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the timing of their achalasia diagnosis and bariatric surgery. Groups were compared in terms of type and timing of intervention as well as treatment response.

Results: Group 1 included 4 patients diagnosed with achalasia before bariatric surgery. Three had laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and 1 had a per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). These patients had laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) within 5 years of achalasia diagnosis. Postoperatively, 1 had severe reflux with regurgitation necessitating radiofrequency energy application to the lower esophageal sphincter. All had relief from dysphagia. Group 2 included 9 patients diagnosed with achalasia after bariatric surgery. Achalasia subtypes were evenly distributed. Initial operations were: 5 LGB, 2 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), 1 duodenal switch (DS), 1 lap band. One LSG patient was converted to LGB concurrently with LHM. On average, achalasia was diagnosed 8.3 years after bariatric surgery. Achalasia interventions included: 1 pneumatic dilation, 1 Botox injection, 1 POEM, 6 LHM. While LHM was the most common procedure, 4 of 6 patients experienced recurrent dysphagia, one of whom required esophagectomy.

Conclusions: Achalasia is a challenging problem in the bariatric surgery population. Recurrent symptoms are common. Patients treated for achalasia after bariatric surgery tended to have worse symptom resolution than those diagnosed prior to bariatric surgery. Additional prospective studies are needed to elucidate whether interventions for achalasia should be performed concurrently or in a particular sequence for optimal results.

Keywords: Achalasia; Bariatric; Dysphagia; Heller; Myotomy; POEM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fisichella PM et al (2015) The surgical management of achalasia in the morbid obese patient. J Gastrointest Surg 19(6):1139–1143 - DOI
    1. Hong D et al (2004) Manometric abnormalities and gastroesophageal reflux disease in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg 14(6):744–749 - DOI
    1. O'Rourke RW et al (2007) Simultaneous surgical management of achalasia and morbid obesity. Obes Surg 17(4):547–549 - DOI
    1. Aiolfi A et al (2019) Management of esophageal achalasia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: narrative review of the literature. Obes Surg 29(5):1632–1637 - DOI
    1. Sadowski DC et al (2010) Achalasia: incidence, prevalence and survival. A population-based study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 22(9):e256–e261 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources