Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data Using Ratio and Power-Based Features
- PMID: 33048903
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004691
Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data Using Ratio and Power-Based Features
Abstract
Objectives: Early prediction of sepsis is of utmost importance to provide optimal care at an early stage. This work aims to deploy soft-computing and machine learning techniques for early prediction of sepsis.
Design: An algorithm for early identification of sepsis using ratio and power-based feature transformation of easily obtainable clinical data.
Setting: PhysioNet Challenge 2019 provided ICU data from three separate hospital systems. Publicly shared data from two hospital systems are used for training and validation purposes, whereas sequestered data from all the three systems is used for testing.
Patients: Over 60,000 ICU patients with up to 40 clinical variables are sourced for each hour of their ICU stay. The Sepsis-3 criterion is applied for annotation.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: The clinical feature exploration for early prediction of sepsis is achieved using the proposed framework named genetic algorithm optimized ratio and power-based expert algorithm. An optimal feature set containing 46 ratio and power-based features is computed from the given patient covariates using genetic algorithm optimized ratio and power-based expert and grouped with identified 17 raw features and 55 statistical features to form a final feature set of 118 clinical features to predict the onset of sepsis in the proceeding 6 hours. The obtained features are fed to a hybrid Random Under-Sampling-Boosting algorithm, called RUSBoost for alleviating the involved class imbalance. The optimal RUSBoost model has achieved a normalized utility score of 0.318 on full test data.
Conclusions: The proposed study supports the realization of a hospital-specific customized solution in the form of an early-warning system for sepsis. However, an extended analysis is necessary to apply this framework for hospital-independent diagnosis of sepsis in general. Nevertheless, the clinical utility of hospital-specific customized solutions based on the proposed method across a wide range of hospital systems needs to be studied.
Similar articles
-
Tensor learning of pointwise mutual information from EHR data for early prediction of sepsis.Comput Biol Med. 2021 Jul;134:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104430. Epub 2021 May 7. Comput Biol Med. 2021. PMID: 33991856
-
A Time-Phased Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Sepsis in Critical Care.Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):e884-e888. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004494. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32931194
-
Early Sepsis Prediction Using Ensemble Learning With Deep Features and Artificial Features Extracted From Clinical Electronic Health Records.Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):e1337-e1342. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004644. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 33044286
-
A Review of Predictive Analytics Solutions for Sepsis Patients.Appl Clin Inform. 2020 May;11(3):387-398. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710525. Epub 2020 May 27. Appl Clin Inform. 2020. PMID: 32462640 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Making the Improbable Possible: Generalizing Models Designed for a Syndrome-Based, Heterogeneous Patient Landscape.Crit Care Clin. 2023 Oct;39(4):751-768. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Apr 26. Crit Care Clin. 2023. PMID: 37704338 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The immune landscape of sepsis and using immune clusters for identifying sepsis endotypes.Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1287415. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1287415. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38707899 Free PMC article.
-
A methodological systematic review of validation and performance of sepsis real-time prediction models.NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 7;8(1):190. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01587-1. NPJ Digit Med. 2025. PMID: 40189694 Free PMC article.
-
Immunomonitoring of Monocyte and Neutrophil Function in Critically Ill Patients: From Sepsis and/or Trauma to COVID-19.J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 12;10(24):5815. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245815. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34945111 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of recency and adequacy of historical information on sepsis predictions using machine learning.Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20869. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00220-x. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34675275 Free PMC article.
-
Risk-standardized sepsis mortality map of the United States.Digit Health. 2022 Jan 20;8:20552076211072400. doi: 10.1177/20552076211072400. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2022. PMID: 35096409 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–810.
-
- Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: For the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:762–774.
-
- Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al.; Sepsis Definitions Task Force: Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: For the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:775–787.
-
- Henry KE, Hager DN, Pronovost PJ, et al. A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:299ra122.
-
- Calvert J, Desautels T, Chettipally U, et al. High-performance detection and early prediction of septic shock for alcohol-use disorder patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016;8:50–55.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical