Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;48(12):1819-1828.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004660.

A Core Outcome Set for Pediatric Critical Care

Affiliations

A Core Outcome Set for Pediatric Critical Care

Ericka L Fink et al. Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: More children are surviving critical illness but are at risk of residual or new health conditions. An evidence-informed and stakeholder-recommended core outcome set is lacking for pediatric critical care outcomes. Our objective was to create a multinational, multistakeholder-recommended pediatric critical care core outcome set for inclusion in clinical and research programs.

Design: A two-round modified Delphi electronic survey was conducted with 333 invited research, clinical, and family/advocate stakeholders. Stakeholders completing the first round were invited to participate in the second. Outcomes scoring greater than 69% "critical" and less than 15% "not important" advanced to round 2 with write-in outcomes considered. The Steering Committee held a virtual consensus conference to determine the final components.

Setting: Multinational survey.

Patients: Stakeholder participants from six continents representing clinicians, researchers, and family/advocates.

Measurements and main results: Overall response rates were 75% and 82% for each round. Participants voted on seven Global Domains and 45 Specific Outcomes in round 1, and six Global Domains and 30 Specific Outcomes in round 2. Using overall (three stakeholder groups combined) results, consensus was defined as outcomes scoring greater than 90% "critical" and less than 15% "not important" and were included in the final PICU core outcome set: four Global Domains (Cognitive, Emotional, Physical, and Overall Health) and four Specific Outcomes (Child Health-Related Quality of Life, Pain, Survival, and Communication). Families (n = 21) suggested additional critically important outcomes that did not meet consensus, which were included in the PICU core outcome set-extended.

Conclusions: The PICU core outcome set and PICU core outcome set-extended are multistakeholder-recommended resources for clinical and research programs that seek to improve outcomes for children with critical illness and their families.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PICU Core Outcome Set: Modified Delphi Survey Flow Diagram
Figures 2a and 2b.
Figures 2a and 2b.
Differences in scores from Round 1 to round 2 by PICU Core Outcome Set stakeholder group.
Figures 2a and 2b.
Figures 2a and 2b.
Differences in scores from Round 1 to round 2 by PICU Core Outcome Set stakeholder group.

Comment in

References

    1. Garber N, Watson RS, Linde‐Zwirble WT. The size and scope of intensive care for children in the US. Critical Care Medicine 2003;31((Suppl)):A78.
    1. Randolph AG, Gonzales CA, Cortellini L, Yeh TS. Growth of pediatric intensive care units in the United States from 1995 to 2001. J Pediatr. 2004;144(6):792–798. - PubMed
    1. Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Funai T, et al. Pediatric intensive care outcomes: development of new morbidities during pediatric critical care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(9):821–827. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manning JC, Pinto NP, Rennick JE, Colville G, Curley MAQ. Conceptualizing Post Intensive Care Syndrome in Children-The PICS-p Framework. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(4):298–300. - PubMed
    1. Fink EL, Tasker RC. Brain-related outcome measures in trials recruiting critically-ill children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31(6):775–782. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types