A Core Outcome Set for Pediatric Critical Care
- PMID: 33048905
- PMCID: PMC7785252
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004660
A Core Outcome Set for Pediatric Critical Care
Abstract
Objectives: More children are surviving critical illness but are at risk of residual or new health conditions. An evidence-informed and stakeholder-recommended core outcome set is lacking for pediatric critical care outcomes. Our objective was to create a multinational, multistakeholder-recommended pediatric critical care core outcome set for inclusion in clinical and research programs.
Design: A two-round modified Delphi electronic survey was conducted with 333 invited research, clinical, and family/advocate stakeholders. Stakeholders completing the first round were invited to participate in the second. Outcomes scoring greater than 69% "critical" and less than 15% "not important" advanced to round 2 with write-in outcomes considered. The Steering Committee held a virtual consensus conference to determine the final components.
Setting: Multinational survey.
Patients: Stakeholder participants from six continents representing clinicians, researchers, and family/advocates.
Measurements and main results: Overall response rates were 75% and 82% for each round. Participants voted on seven Global Domains and 45 Specific Outcomes in round 1, and six Global Domains and 30 Specific Outcomes in round 2. Using overall (three stakeholder groups combined) results, consensus was defined as outcomes scoring greater than 90% "critical" and less than 15% "not important" and were included in the final PICU core outcome set: four Global Domains (Cognitive, Emotional, Physical, and Overall Health) and four Specific Outcomes (Child Health-Related Quality of Life, Pain, Survival, and Communication). Families (n = 21) suggested additional critically important outcomes that did not meet consensus, which were included in the PICU core outcome set-extended.
Conclusions: The PICU core outcome set and PICU core outcome set-extended are multistakeholder-recommended resources for clinical and research programs that seek to improve outcomes for children with critical illness and their families.
Figures
Comment in
-
The Core of Pediatric Critical Care Research.Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1909-1911. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004699. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 33255112 No abstract available.
References
-
- Garber N, Watson RS, Linde‐Zwirble WT. The size and scope of intensive care for children in the US. Critical Care Medicine 2003;31((Suppl)):A78.
-
- Randolph AG, Gonzales CA, Cortellini L, Yeh TS. Growth of pediatric intensive care units in the United States from 1995 to 2001. J Pediatr. 2004;144(6):792–798. - PubMed
-
- Manning JC, Pinto NP, Rennick JE, Colville G, Curley MAQ. Conceptualizing Post Intensive Care Syndrome in Children-The PICS-p Framework. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(4):298–300. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- UG1 HD049983/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HD049983/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD063108/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- RL1 HD107773/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- U01 HD049934/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD049981/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- K23 HD096018/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD050096/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD083170/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD083166/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- UG1 HD083171/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- L30 HL143674/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States