Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;57(2):204-214.
doi: 10.1002/uog.23149.

First-trimester fetal neurosonography: technique and diagnostic potential

N Volpe  1 , A Dall'Asta  1 , E Di Pasquo  1 , T Frusca  1 , T Ghi  1
Affiliations
Free article
Review

First-trimester fetal neurosonography: technique and diagnostic potential

N Volpe et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Most brain abnormalities are present in the first trimester, but only a few are detected so early in gestation. According to current recommendations for first-trimester ultrasound, the fetal head structures that should be visualized are limited to the cranial bones, the midline falx and the choroid-plexus-filled ventricles. Using this basic approach, almost all cases of acrania, alobar holoprosencephaly and cephalocele are detected. However, the majority of other fetal brain abnormalities remain undiagnosed until the midtrimester. Such anomalies would be potentially detectable if the sonographic study were to be extended to include additional anatomic details not currently included in existing guidelines. The aim of this review article is to describe how best to assess the normal fetal brain by first-trimester expert multiplanar neurosonography and to demonstrate the early sonographic findings that characterize some major fetal brain abnormalities. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Keywords: brain development; fetal neurosonogram; multiplanar imaging; sonoembriology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Morris JK, Wellesley DG, Barisic I, Addor MC, Bergman JEH, Braz P, Cavero-Carbonell C, Draper ES, Gatt M, Haeusler M, Klungsoyr K, Kurinczuk JJ, Lelong N, Luyt K, Lynch C, O'Mahony MT, Mokoroa O, Nelen V, Neville AJ, Pierini A, Randrianaivo H, Rankin J, Rissmann A, Rouget F, Schaub B, Tucker DF, Verellen-Dumoulin C, Wiesel A, Zymak-Zakutnia N, Lanzoni M, Garne E. Epidemiology of congenital cerebral anomalies in Europe: A multicentre, population-based EUROCAT study. Arch Dis Child 2019; 104: 1181-1187.
    1. Anderson N, Boswell O, Duff G. Prenatal sonography for the detection of fetal anomalies: Results of a prospective study and comparison with prior series. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 943-950.
    1. Bernaschek G, Stuempflen I, Deutinger J. The value of sonographic diagnosis of fetal malformations: Different results between indication-based and screening-based investigations. Prenat Diagn 1994; 14: 807-812.
    1. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘fetal neurosonogram’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 109-116.
    1. Syngelaki A, Chelemen T, Dagklis T, Allan L, Nicolaides KH. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 90-102.

LinkOut - more resources