Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 11;12(10):2924.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12102924.

External Validation of the SERC Trial Population: Comparison with the Multicenter French Cohort, the Swedish and SENOMIC Trial Populations for Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Node Micro-Metastasis

Affiliations

External Validation of the SERC Trial Population: Comparison with the Multicenter French Cohort, the Swedish and SENOMIC Trial Populations for Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Node Micro-Metastasis

Gilles Houvenaeghel et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Many trials confirmed the safety of omitting axillary dissection in the selected patients treated for early breast cancer. The external validity of these trials is questionable. Our study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the French population representativity in the SERC trial and the differences between these two populations as well as comparing the French and the Swedish populations (the SENOMIC trial population and the Swedish National Breast Cancer Registry (NKBC) cohort) of patients with sentinel node (SN) micro-metastasis. A higher rate of smaller tumors and grade 1 tumors was observed in the French cohort when compared to the SERC population. Our findings conclude that both French populations show similar characteristics. Positive non-sentinel node (NSN) rates at completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were 10.28 % and 11.3 % in the SERC trial and French cohort, respectively (p = 0.5). The rate of grade 1 tumors was lower in the SENOMIC trial (16.2%) and in the NKBC cohort (17.4%) compared to the SERC trial population (27.3%) and the French cohort (34.4%). Our findings in addition to the previously demonstrated concordance between the SENOMIC trial and the NKBC populations imply that the results of both the SERC and the SENOMIC trials can be applied to both French and Swedish real populations.

Keywords: breast cancer; micro-metastases; sentinel node; trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rothwell P.M. External validity of randomised controlled trials: To whom do the results of this trial apply? Lancet. 2005;365:82–93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ford I., Norrie J. Pragmatic Trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:454–463. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Boniface J., Frisell J., Andersson Y., Bergkvist L., Ahlgren J., Rydén L., Bagge R.O., Sund M., Johannson H., Lundstedt D., et al. Survival and axillary recurrence following sentinel node-positive breast cancer without completion axillary lymph node dissection: The randomized controlled SENOMAC trial. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:379. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3361-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goyal A., Dodwell D. POSNOC: A Randomised Trial Looking at Axillary Treatment in Women with One or Two Sentinel Nodes with Macrometastases. Clin. Oncol. 2015;27:692–695. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giuliano A.E. Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection in Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2011;305:569. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources