Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Oct 13;10(10):e036533.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036533.

Patient-reported experiences with general practitioners: a randomised study of mail and web-based approaches following a national survey

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Patient-reported experiences with general practitioners: a randomised study of mail and web-based approaches following a national survey

Hilde Hestad Iversen et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The standard data-collection procedure in the Norwegian national patient experience survey programme is post-discharge mail surveys, which include a pen-and-paper questionnaire with the option to answer electronically. A purely electronic protocol has not previously been explored in Norway. The aim of this study was to compare response rates, background characteristics, data quality and main study results for a survey of patient experiences with general practitioners (GPs) administered by the standard mail data-collection procedure and a web-based approach.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: GP offices in Norway.

Participants: The sample consisted of 6999 patients aged 16 years and older registered with a GP in November 2018.

Intervention: Based on a three-stage sampling design, 6999 patients of GPs aged 16 or older were randomised to one of two survey administration protocols: Group A, who were mailed an invitation with both a pen-and-paper including an electronic response option (n=4999) and Group B, who received an email invitation with electronic response option (n=2000).

Main outcome measures: Response rates, background characteristics, data quality and main study results.

Results: The response rate was markedly higher for the mail survey (42.6%) than for the web-based survey (18.3%). A few of the background variables differed significantly between the two groups, but the data quality and patient-reported experiences were similar.

Conclusions: Web-based surveys are faster and less expensive than standard mail surveys, but their low response rates and coverage problems threaten their usefulness and legitimacy. Initiatives to increase response rates for web-based data collection and strategies for tailoring data collection to different groups should be key elements in future research.

Keywords: primary care; quality in health care; statistics & research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram.

References

    1. Eide TB, Straand J, Rosvold EO. Patients' and GPs' expectations regarding healthcare-seeking behaviour: a Norwegian comparative study. BJGP Open 2018;2:bjgpopen18X101615. 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101615 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjertnaes OA, Iversen HH. User-experience surveys with maternity services: a randomized comparison of two data collection models. Int J Qual Health Care 2012;24:433–8. 10.1093/intqhc/mzs031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjertnaes O, Iversen HH, Skrivarhaug T. A randomized comparison of three data collection models for the measurement of parent experiences with diabetes outpatient care. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:95. 10.1186/s12874-018-0557-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holmboe O, Bjertnæs OA. Patient experiences with Norwegian hospitals in 2015. results following a national survey. PasOpp-report 147; 2016. ISSN 1890-1565. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, 2016.
    1. Holmboe O, Danielsen K, Iversen HH. Development of a method for the measurement of patient experiences with regular general practitioners. PasOpp-report 1; 2015. ISSN 1890-1565. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, 2015.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources