Patient-reported experiences with general practitioners: a randomised study of mail and web-based approaches following a national survey
- PMID: 33051230
- PMCID: PMC7554501
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036533
Patient-reported experiences with general practitioners: a randomised study of mail and web-based approaches following a national survey
Abstract
Objective: The standard data-collection procedure in the Norwegian national patient experience survey programme is post-discharge mail surveys, which include a pen-and-paper questionnaire with the option to answer electronically. A purely electronic protocol has not previously been explored in Norway. The aim of this study was to compare response rates, background characteristics, data quality and main study results for a survey of patient experiences with general practitioners (GPs) administered by the standard mail data-collection procedure and a web-based approach.
Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Setting: GP offices in Norway.
Participants: The sample consisted of 6999 patients aged 16 years and older registered with a GP in November 2018.
Intervention: Based on a three-stage sampling design, 6999 patients of GPs aged 16 or older were randomised to one of two survey administration protocols: Group A, who were mailed an invitation with both a pen-and-paper including an electronic response option (n=4999) and Group B, who received an email invitation with electronic response option (n=2000).
Main outcome measures: Response rates, background characteristics, data quality and main study results.
Results: The response rate was markedly higher for the mail survey (42.6%) than for the web-based survey (18.3%). A few of the background variables differed significantly between the two groups, but the data quality and patient-reported experiences were similar.
Conclusions: Web-based surveys are faster and less expensive than standard mail surveys, but their low response rates and coverage problems threaten their usefulness and legitimacy. Initiatives to increase response rates for web-based data collection and strategies for tailoring data collection to different groups should be key elements in future research.
Keywords: primary care; quality in health care; statistics & research methods.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Holmboe O, Bjertnæs OA. Patient experiences with Norwegian hospitals in 2015. results following a national survey. PasOpp-report 147; 2016. ISSN 1890-1565. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, 2016.
-
- Holmboe O, Danielsen K, Iversen HH. Development of a method for the measurement of patient experiences with regular general practitioners. PasOpp-report 1; 2015. ISSN 1890-1565. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources