Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;6(10):1242-1249.
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00786-w. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers

Isabelle Baltenweck  1 , Debbie Cherney  2 , Alan Duncan  3   4 , Erin Eldermire  2 , Edda Tandi Lwoga  5 , Ricardo Labarta  6 , Elizaphan James Oburu Rao  3 , Steven Staal  3 , Nils Teufel  3
Affiliations

A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers

Isabelle Baltenweck et al. Nat Plants. 2020 Oct.

Erratum in

Abstract

Livestock support the livelihoods of one billion people in Africa, Asia and Latin America, but the productivity of animals remains low, reducing the potential of the sector to support higher incomes and better nutrition. Improved livestock feeding has been identified as the most important step towards higher productivity. This scoping review assessed the evidence for the uptake of improved ruminant livestock feed options, the effect of this uptake on livestock productivity and the degree to which this improves smallholder farmer livelihoods. In total, 22,981 papers were identified, of which 73 papers were included in the final analysis after a rigorous double-blind screening review. Only papers that reported farmers' decision to use a new feed intervention were selected, thereby excluding feeding trials and participatory feed assessments. Of the 73 papers, only 6 reported combined evidence of adoption, effect on productivity and livelihood changes. A total of 58 papers looked at adoption, 19 at productivity change and 22 at livelihood change. This scoping review highlights the gap in evidence for the adoption of new livestock feeding practices and provides recommendations to support farmers' uptake of feed interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Thorne, P. & Conroy, C. in Agricultural Systems 2nd edn (eds Snapp, S. & Pound, B.) 303–330 (Academic Press, 2017); 10.1016/B978-0-12-802070-8.00009-8
    1. Headey D, Hirvonen K, Hoddinott J. Animal sourced foods and child stunting. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2018;100.5:1302–1319. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aay053. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerosa, S. & Skoet, J. Milk Availability: Trends in Production and Demand and Medium-Term Outlook ESA Working Paper No. 12-01 (FAO, 2012); http://www.fao.org/3/a-an450e.pdf
    1. Livestock Primary (FAO, accessed January 2020).
    1. McDermott JJ, Staal SJ, Freeman HA, Herrero M, Van de Steeg JA. Sustaining intensification of smallholder livestock systems in the tropics. Livest. Sci. 2010;130.1-3:95–109. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.014. - DOI

Publication types