Adherence to the Physical Distancing Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A HAPA-Based Perspective
- PMID: 33052008
- DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12242
Adherence to the Physical Distancing Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A HAPA-Based Perspective
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic requires massive and rapid behavior change. The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) describes personal determinants that play a key role in behavior change. This study investigated whether these determinants are associated with adherence to physical distancing measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 (i.e. keeping 1.5 m physical distance and staying at home). Decreased psychosocial well-being and lack of social support were explored as barriers to adherence.
Methods: Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted among adults in Belgium. The first survey (N = 2,379; March 2020) focused on adherence to physical distancing measures. The second survey (N = 805; April 2020) focused on difficulty with, and perseverance in, adhering to these measures. Linear regression models were fitted to examine associations with HAPA determinants, psychosocial well-being, and social support.
Results: Self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, intention, action planning, and coping planning were related to adhering to, difficulty with, and perseverance in, adhering to physical distancing measures. Decreased psychosocial well-being and lack of social support were related to more difficulties with adhering to physical distancing and lower perseverance.
Conclusions: Health action process approach determinants are associated with adherence to physical distancing measures. Future work could design HAPA-based interventions to support people in adhering to these measures.
Keywords: COVID-19; HAPA; physical distancing; psychosocial well-being; social support.
© 2020 International Association of Applied Psychology.
Similar articles
-
Application of the Health Action Process Approach to Social Distancing Behavior During COVID-19.Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1244-1269. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12231. Epub 2020 Oct 2. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020. PMID: 33006814 Free PMC article.
-
Threat, Coping, and Social Distance Adherence During COVID-19: Cross-Continental Comparison Using an Online Cross-Sectional Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 18;22(11):e23019. doi: 10.2196/23019. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 33119538 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
When, why, and how do People Deviate from Physical Distancing Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study.Psychol Belg. 2021 Sep 2;61(1):262-273. doi: 10.5334/pb.1089. eCollection 2021. Psychol Belg. 2021. PMID: 34540263 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of research on the determinants of adherence to social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Sep;15(3):350-370. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1934062. Epub 2021 Jun 18. Health Psychol Rev. 2021. PMID: 34027798
-
Factors Associated With Increased Alcohol Consumption During Physical and Social Distancing Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a University in Brazil.Subst Abuse. 2022 Jun 21;16:11782218211061140. doi: 10.1177/11782218211061140. eCollection 2022. Subst Abuse. 2022. PMID: 35754981 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of questionnaires on adherence to physical distancing and health beliefs about COVID-19 in the general population.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 6;14:1132169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1132169. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37484663 Free PMC article.
-
Exposure to images showing (non)adherence to physical distancing rules: Effect on adherence behavior and perceived social norms.PLoS One. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0276936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276936. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36322598 Free PMC article.
-
A Qualitative Study Evaluating the Factors Affecting Families' Adherence to the First COVID-19 Lockdown in England Using the COM-B Model and TDF.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7305. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127305. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35742548 Free PMC article.
-
Social determinants of adherence to COVID-19 preventive guidelines: a comprehensive review.Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2021 Dec;12(6):346-360. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2021.0180. Epub 2021 Dec 21. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2021. PMID: 34965686 Free PMC article.
-
Individual differences and compliance intentions with COVID-19 restrictions: insights from a lockdown in Melbourne (Australia).Health Promot Int. 2022 Jun 1;37(3):daac089. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac089. Health Promot Int. 2022. PMID: 35901172 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brooks, S.K., Webster, R.K., Smith, L.E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G.J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912-920.
-
- Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., … PROMIS Cooperative Group (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179-1194.
-
- Craciun, C., Schüz, N., Lippke, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2012). Facilitating sunscreen use in women by a theory-based online intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(2), 207-216.
-
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2020). Considerations relating to social distancing measures in response to COVID-19: Second update. Stockholm.
-
- Gellert, P., Ziegelmann, J.P., Warner, L., & Schwarzer, R. (2011). Physical activity intervention in older adults: Does a participating partner make a difference? European Journal of Ageing, 8, 211-219.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous