Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;68(4):1040-1050.
doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3030890. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Phase-Aberration Correction for HIFU Therapy Using a Multielement Array and Backscattering of Nonlinear Pulses

Phase-Aberration Correction for HIFU Therapy Using a Multielement Array and Backscattering of Nonlinear Pulses

Gilles P L Thomas et al. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Phase aberrations induced by heterogeneities in body wall tissues introduce a shift and broadening of the high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) focus, associated with decreased focal intensity. This effect is particularly detrimental for HIFU therapies that rely on shock front formation at the focus, such as boiling histotripsy (BH). In this article, an aberration correction method based on the backscattering of nonlinear ultrasound pulses from the focus is proposed and evaluated in tissue-mimicking phantoms. A custom BH system comprising a 1.5-MHz 256-element array connected to a Verasonics V1 engine was used as a pulse/echo probe. Pulse inversion imaging was implemented to visualize the second harmonic of the backscattered signal from the focus inside a phantom when propagating through an aberrating layer. Phase correction for each array element was derived from an aberration-correction method for ultrasound imaging that combines both the beamsum and the nearest neighbor correlation method and adapted it to the unique configuration of the array. The results were confirmed by replacing the target tissue with a fiber-optic hydrophone. Comparing the shock amplitude before and after phase-aberration correction showed that the majority of losses due to tissue heterogeneity were compensated, enabling fully developed shocks to be generated while focusing through aberrating layers. The feasibility of using a HIFU phased-array transducer as a pulse-echo probe in harmonic imaging mode to correct for phase aberrations was demonstrated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(a) Photograph of the 256-element HIFU array. (b) Layout of the array elements with one of the 16 spiral arms shown in green.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Path of the loop across a 2D projection of the array, generated using the travelling salesman problem optimization method. Element number 0 is represented in red while element 255 is in magenta.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
(a) Focal pressure waveform produced by the HIFU array in the pulse/echo mode. (b)-(d) Simulated HIFU pressure distributions along the propagation axis z (b) and the two transverse axes (c) and (d) in the focal plane at the fundamental frequency of 1.5 MHz formula image, second harmonic formula image and third harmonic formula image at a system drive voltage of 8V (68 W acoustic power) [46].
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
(a) Pressure pulses constituting a pulse inversion sequence produced by the HIFU array and measured with FOPH at the array focus during a pulse inversion sequence for the system driving voltage of 8V. (b) Sum of the pressure pulses. (c) Sum of the pressure pulses reflected from the FOPH tip positioned at the HIFU focus and acquired by the HIFU array elements shown for all array elements.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Experimental setup.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Top: RF signal on one element. (a) Proximal face of the body wall phantom, (b) interface between the layers in the body wall phantom, (c) proximal face of the blood clot phantom, (d) focus of the transducer, where formula image represents the length of the focal lobe of the second harmonic. Bottom: beamsum around the focus.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Example of the output of step 2 of the aberration correction algorithm, where the threshold Γ is represented as formula image. The area between the two vertical dashed lines illustrates a cluster of HIFU array elements with low correlation coefficients to the beamsum signal, and a corresponding high variance in phase error estimates.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Representative example of the output of Step 3 (nearest neighbor method) formula image, plotted together with the output of Step 2 (beamsum method) formula image. High phase error variance from the beamsum method was successfully removed by the “anchored” nearest neighbor method.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
RF signal segments corresponding to the HIFU focus obtained with the soft tissue phantom (a) without the aberration-inducing phantom; (b)with the aberration-inducing phantom, before aberration correction. The transmit focus time Tf is outlined as formula image.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.
(a) Normalized value of the function Φ for each iteration. (b) Phase correction applied to each element of the array. (c) RF signals of the corrected beam with the transmit focus time Tf is outlined as formula image.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11.
Legend: measurements with the aberration-inducing phantom and no correction: formula image, with the aberration-inducing phantom and correction: formula image, in water: formula image. (a) Waveforms at the focus for the same derated voltage of 15V in water. (b) Peak positive pressure and (c) peak negative pressure at the focus as functions of the input voltage (derated if the phantom is present). (d)-(g) Transverse beam profiles in the focal plane for the same derated voltage as 15V in water.

References

    1. ter Haar G and Coussios C, “High intensity focused ultrasound: physical principles and devices,” International Journal of Hyperthermia. vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 89–104, 2007. - PubMed
    1. Xu Z, Ludomirsky A, Eun LY, Hall TL, Tran BC, Fowlkes JB, and Cain CA, “Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 726–736, 2004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khokhlova TD, Canney MS, Khokhlova VA, Sapozhnikov OA, Crum LA, and Bailey MR, “Controlled tissue emulsification produced by high intensity focused ultrasound shock waves and millisecond boiling,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 3498–3510, 2011. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canney MS, Khokhlova VA, Bessonova OV, Bailey MR, and Crum LA, “Shock-induced heating and millisecond boiling in gels and tissue due to high intensity focused ultrasound,” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 250–267, 2010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simon JC, Sapozhnikov OA, Khokhlova VA, Wang Y-N, Crum LA, and Bailey MR, “Ultrasonic atomization of tissue and its role in tissue fractionation by high intensity focused ultrasound,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 57, no. 23, p. 8061, 2012. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types