Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence
- PMID: 33057217
- PMCID: PMC8144864
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2766-y
Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence
Abstract
Breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) hold enormous potential as it can automate complex tasks and go even beyond human performance. In their study, McKinney et al. showed the high potential of AI for breast cancer screening. However, the lack of methods’ details and algorithm code undermines its scientific value. Here, we identify obstacles hindering transparent and reproducible AI research as faced by McKinney et al., and provide solutions to these obstacles with implications for the broader field.
Comment in
-
Reply to: Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence.Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7829):E17-E18. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2767-x. Nature. 2020. PMID: 33057218 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7788):89-94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. Epub 2020 Jan 1. Nature. 2020. PMID: 31894144
References
-
- McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V & Godwin J. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature (2020). - PubMed
-
- Nature Research Editorial Policies. Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and protocols. Springer Nature; https://www.nature.com/nature-research/editorial-policies/reporting-stan....
-
- Gundersen OE, Gil Y & Aha DW On reproducible AI: Towards reproducible research, open science, and digital scholarship in AI publications. AI Magazine 39, 56–68 (2018).
-
- Crane M. Questionable Answers in Question Answering Research: Reproducibility and Variability of Published Results. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 6, 241–252 (2018).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources