The ABCdE score for PREdicting Lithotripsy Assistance during transcystic Bile duct Exploration by Laparoendoscopy (PRE-LABEL)
- PMID: 33057856
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08082-6
The ABCdE score for PREdicting Lithotripsy Assistance during transcystic Bile duct Exploration by Laparoendoscopy (PRE-LABEL)
Abstract
Background: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are reported in ~ 15% of patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Prior to lithotripsy techniques, transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) was limited to smaller CBD stones. The addition of lithotripsy to LCBDE increases cost, operative time and staffing requirements. Predicting which patients might require lithotripsy would be useful in operative planning. The primary aim was to investigate clinical variables for predicting lithotripsy assistance during transcystic bile duct exploration by laparoendoscopy (PRE-LABEL). Secondary aims were to develop and validate a predictive scoring tool.
Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of consecutive patients who underwent transcystic LCBDE at a single centre in the UK was performed to investigate clinical variables for PRE-LABEL and develop a scoring tool (ABCdE score: age, bilirubin, CBD diameter, ERCP). Binary logistic regression was used to investigate which independent variables (predictors) were associated with lithotripsy assistance during transcystic LCBDE. The ABCdE score was applied to both UK and Spain patient cohorts to determine its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.
Results: From 8 pre-operative clinical variables analysed, age ≤ 40 years, bilirubin > two-times upper limit of normal, CBD diameter ≥ 10 mm and ERCP failure of stone extraction were independent predictors of requiring lithotripsy during transcystic LCBDE and formed the ABCdE score. The hazard ratios were 2.87, 3.79, 2.78 and 10.06, respectively. An ABCdE score ≥ 2 resulted in 71% sensitivity, 81% specificity and 79% accuracy in predicting lithotripsy during LCBDE (UK cohort). Validation using a contemporary cohort from Spain yielded similar sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.
Conclusions: This study represents the only study to date reporting independent predictors of requiring lithotripsy assistance during transcystic LCBDE. ABCdE score ≥ 2 can highlight patients that may require lithotripsy in order to avoid failure of transcystic LCBDE and therefore avoid choledochotomy or post-operative ERCP.
Keywords: ABCdE (age, bilirubin, CBD diameter, ERCP) score; Choledocholithiasis; Common bile duct stones; Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; Lithotripsy-assisted bile duct exploration by laparoendoscopy (LABEL); Predicting lithotripsy assistance during transcystic bile duct exploration by laparoendoscopy (PRE-LABEL); Transcystic choledochoscopy.
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Ko CW, Lee SP (2002) Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease. Gastrointest Endosc 56(6 Suppl):S165-169 - DOI
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2014) Gallstone disease: diagnosis and management. Clinical guideline 188 [CG188]. October 2014.
-
- Pang L, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Kong J (2018) Transcystic versus traditional laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: its advantages and a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(11):4363–4376 - DOI
-
- Navaratne L, Martinez Isla A (2020) Transductal versus transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: an institutional review of over four hundred cases. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07522-7 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Reinders JS, Gouma DJ, Ubbink DT, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D (2014) Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis: a systematic review. World J Surg 38(9):2403–2411 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources