"Putting Meat on the Bones": Understanding the Implementation of a Community-Based Early Intervention and Prevention Programme-Contextual, Person, and Programme Influences
- PMID: 33057874
- DOI: 10.1007/s11121-020-01170-y
"Putting Meat on the Bones": Understanding the Implementation of a Community-Based Early Intervention and Prevention Programme-Contextual, Person, and Programme Influences
Abstract
The adoption and effective delivery of evidence-based interventions within "real-world" community-based, primary health care service settings are of crucial importance. In this paper, we explore the successes and challenges of implementing a new complex, group-based, early parenting intervention called the Parent and Infant (PIN) programme. This study involved a systematic analysis of the processes and factors that influence the implementation of the PIN programme; the analysis was guided and informed by the Implementation Outcome Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A documentary review, alongside a series of one-to-one interviews and small group discussions with a range of stakeholders (n = 44), and 7 focus groups (n = 24) were used as data sources. Factors that promoted programme adoption, acceptability, and implementation feasibility included programme characteristics and stakeholder attitudes, as well as organisational and systems factors (e.g. leadership and collaboration). Key challenges to implementation success included engagement and adoption barriers. This research provides a useful and important example of real-world, theory-driven implementation research which helped to identify interrelated processes, factors, and contexts which shape and influence the implementation of early intervention and prevention programmes, removed for blind review.
Keywords: Early intervention and prevention; Early parenting intervention; Evaluation; Implementation outcomes; Implementation science; Mechanisms of impact.
Similar articles
-
Understanding the implementation and effectiveness of a group-based early parenting intervention: a process evaluation protocol.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 15;16:490. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1737-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27633777 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Leadership perspectives on key elements influencing implementing a family-focused intervention in mental health services.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;27(5):616-627. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12615. Epub 2020 Feb 24. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020. PMID: 32037644 Clinical Trial.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x. Obes Rev. 2006. PMID: 16371076 Review.
-
Parent education interventions designed to support the transition to parenthood: A realist review.Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jul;59:118-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016. PMID: 27222457 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimizing Engagement: Factors Influencing Family Participation in a Positive Parenting Program among Vulnerable Households with Young Children.Psychosoc Interv. 2025 Jan 2;34(1):53-66. doi: 10.5093/pi2025a5. eCollection 2025 Jan. Psychosoc Interv. 2025. PMID: 39781015 Free PMC article.
-
Does Social and Economic Disadvantage Predict Lower Engagement with Parenting Interventions? An Integrative Analysis Using Individual Participant Data.Prev Sci. 2023 Nov;24(8):1447-1458. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01404-1. Epub 2022 Jul 23. Prev Sci. 2023. PMID: 35870094 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators in the delivery of a proportionate universal parenting program model (E-SEE Steps) in community family services.PLoS One. 2022 Jun 13;17(6):e0265946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265946. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35696375 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Perceived acceptability and appropriateness of a web-based program targeting risk for anxiety in young children and their parents.J Pediatr Psychol. 2025 Jan 1;50(1):6-17. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsae040. J Pediatr Psychol. 2025. PMID: 38857450 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Akin, B. A., Strolin-Goltzman, J., & Collins-Camargo, C. (2017). Successes and challenges in developing trauma-informed child welfare systems: a real-world case study of exploration and initial implementation. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 42–52.
-
- Akin, B. A., Johnson-Motoyama, M., Davis, S., Paceley, M., & Brook, J. (2018). Parent perspectives of engagement in the strengthening families program: an evidence-based intervention for families in child welfare and affected by parental substance use. Child & Family Social Work, 23, 735–742.
-
- Álvarez, M., Rodrigo, M. J., & Byrne, S. (2018). What implementation components predict positive outcomes in a parenting program? Research on Social Work Practice, 28, 173–187.
-
- Baranowski, T., & Stables, G. (2000). Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 157–166.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical