Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;22(1):113-129.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01170-y. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

"Putting Meat on the Bones": Understanding the Implementation of a Community-Based Early Intervention and Prevention Programme-Contextual, Person, and Programme Influences

Affiliations

"Putting Meat on the Bones": Understanding the Implementation of a Community-Based Early Intervention and Prevention Programme-Contextual, Person, and Programme Influences

Gráinne Hickey et al. Prev Sci. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

The adoption and effective delivery of evidence-based interventions within "real-world" community-based, primary health care service settings are of crucial importance. In this paper, we explore the successes and challenges of implementing a new complex, group-based, early parenting intervention called the Parent and Infant (PIN) programme. This study involved a systematic analysis of the processes and factors that influence the implementation of the PIN programme; the analysis was guided and informed by the Implementation Outcome Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A documentary review, alongside a series of one-to-one interviews and small group discussions with a range of stakeholders (n = 44), and 7 focus groups (n = 24) were used as data sources. Factors that promoted programme adoption, acceptability, and implementation feasibility included programme characteristics and stakeholder attitudes, as well as organisational and systems factors (e.g. leadership and collaboration). Key challenges to implementation success included engagement and adoption barriers. This research provides a useful and important example of real-world, theory-driven implementation research which helped to identify interrelated processes, factors, and contexts which shape and influence the implementation of early intervention and prevention programmes, removed for blind review.

Keywords: Early intervention and prevention; Early parenting intervention; Evaluation; Implementation outcomes; Implementation science; Mechanisms of impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aarons, G. A., Farahnak, L. R., Ehrhart, M. G., & Sklar, M. (2014). Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop a strategic climate for evidence-based practice implementation. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 255–274. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Akin, B. A., Strolin-Goltzman, J., & Collins-Camargo, C. (2017). Successes and challenges in developing trauma-informed child welfare systems: a real-world case study of exploration and initial implementation. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 42–52.
    1. Akin, B. A., Johnson-Motoyama, M., Davis, S., Paceley, M., & Brook, J. (2018). Parent perspectives of engagement in the strengthening families program: an evidence-based intervention for families in child welfare and affected by parental substance use. Child & Family Social Work, 23, 735–742.
    1. Álvarez, M., Rodrigo, M. J., & Byrne, S. (2018). What implementation components predict positive outcomes in a parenting program? Research on Social Work Practice, 28, 173–187.
    1. Baranowski, T., & Stables, G. (2000). Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 157–166.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources